Hybrid materials based on rubber blend nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
In this applicative work, two types of silica filler were used to increase the adhesion strength between steel and elastomeric hybrid materials based on chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubber (CSM) and polychloroprene rubber (CR) as network precursors. Precipitated silica (PS) with the average size of primary particles 15 nm and diatomaceous earth (DE) with the average size of primary particles 28 μm were used to ascertain differences in metal‐elastomer compounds adhesion strength caused by different particle size. The ratio of network precursors in CSM/CR rubber blends was 50:50 (w/w). The filler loading was in the range of 0–35 phr. Characteristics of the obtained composites were examined by combining the cure kinetics, adhesion strength and the dynamic mechanical properties. The viscoelasticity of obtained hybrid materials was assessed by the mechanical spectrometer (in a single cantilever bending mode) in the temperature range from −50 °C to 150 °C using multifrequency mode. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:3056–3064, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Nuclear Science Vinča University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia
Tigar Nikole Pašića 213, 18300 Pirot Serbia
Faculty of Technology University of Novi Sad Bulevar cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad Serbia
Faculty of Natural Science and Mathematics University of Priština Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica Serbia
Funding
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.02.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2005.02.003 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002 ↗
3. 10.2298/CICEQ110315017M10.2298/CICEQ110315017M ↗
4. 10.5254/1.354821510.5254/1.3548215 ↗
5. 10.1021/bk-2010-1061.ch01210.1021/bk-2010-1061.ch012 ↗
6. 10.1134/S003602441113013910.1134/S0036024411130139 ↗
7. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.494.47510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.494.475 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.10.01510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.10.015 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10973-009-0562-x10.1007/s10973-009-0562-x ↗
10. Byers J.T. · Rubb. World · 1998 · 218 · 38
11. 10.5254/1.353861510.5254/1.3538615 ↗
12. 10.5254/1.353844710.5254/1.3538447 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.1995.07055120310.1002/app.1995.070551203 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.009 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2003.11.00310.1016/j.matdes.2003.11.003 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.10.06810.1016/j.jcis.2006.10.068 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.004 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-9418(00)00073-810.1016/S0142-9418(00)00073-8 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00014-410.1016/S0142-9418(02)00014-4 ↗
20. 10.1002/app.2169110.1002/app.21691 ↗
21. Hassan H.H. · Meter. Des. · 2012 · 34 · 533
22. 10.1002/pen.1108410.1002/pen.11084 ↗
23. 10.1163/156856189X0014610.1163/156856189X00146 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.04.04510.1016/j.polymer.2011.04.045 ↗