journal article·2012-11

Air‐dried 3D‐collagen–chitosan biocomposite scaffold for tissue engineering application

B. Santhosh Kumar, Sahaja Aigal, D. Vijaya Ramesh

Polymer Composites· Volume 33· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Collagen–chitosan scaffolds of different compositions were developed using emulsion air‐drying method. The scaffolds prepared adding 10–30 wt% of chitosan to collagen improved the mechanical properties of the composite scaffold, and 7:3 ratio (collagen :chitosan) was found to be a better composite having a tensile strength of 13.57 MPa with 9% elongation at break. The water‐uptake characteristics were performed at different pH and found to be ameliorated for the composite scaffolds compared to pure collagen and chitosan scaffold, respectively. The pores ranging from 100 to 300 μm were well interconnected, and their distribution was fairly homogeneous in the scaffold as observed through scanning electron microscopy. Furthermore, the scaffold decreased the bacterial counts and supported fibroblasts attachment and proliferation, thus demonstrating this composite to be a good substrate for biomedical application.POLYM. COMPOS., 33:2029–2035, 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Collagen: Extraction and Characterization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1369-7021(04)00233-010.1016/S1369-7021(04)00233-0 ↗
2. Chvapil M. · 1980 · 313
3. Phariss B.B. · J. Am. Leather. Chem. Assoc. · 1980 · 75 · 474
4. 10.1159/00012852910.1159/000128529 ↗
5. 10.1016/0142-9612(92)90007-B10.1016/0142-9612(92)90007-B ↗
6. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:1<8::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(2000)53:1<8::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
7. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199708)36:2<163::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-I10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199708)36:2<163::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
8. 10.1016/0142-9612(96)87654-X10.1016/0142-9612(96)87654-X ↗
9. 10.1002/jbm.82011050810.1002/jbm.820110508 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.03710.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.037 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.05210.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.052 ↗
12. 10.1002/jbm.82027030510.1002/jbm.820270305 ↗
13. 10.4012/dmj.16.110.4012/dmj.16.1 ↗
14. Schoen F.J. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 1988 · 22 · 11
15. Golomb G. · Am. J. Pathol. · 1987 · 127 · 122
16. Rutten H.J.T. · Eur. J. Surg. · 1997 · 163 · 31
17. Stemberger H. · Eur. J. Surg. · 1997 · 163 · 17
18. 10.1002/jbm.b.3005110.1002/jbm.b.30051 ↗
19. 10.1016/0002-9610(70)90175-310.1016/0002-9610(70)90175-3 ↗
20. 10.1016/0142-9612(88)90092-010.1016/0142-9612(88)90092-0 ↗
21. 10.1002/1097-4636(20000915)51:4<586::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/1097-4636(20000915)51:4<586::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
22. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00017-310.1016/S0142-9612(97)00017-3 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00187-910.1016/S0142-9612(01)00187-9 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.1165110.1002/app.11651 ↗
25. P.K.Sehgal B.Manimalha andD.V.Ramesh Ind. Pat. Appl. No. 1351 Del‐99 (1999).
26. 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.06890.x10.1046/j.1525-1594.2002.06890.x ↗
27. 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90055-710.1016/0142-9612(93)90055-7 ↗
28. 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00068-810.1016/S1010-7940(99)00068-8 ↗
29. Controversies in Orthopaedic Sport Medicine
30. 10.1016/S0022-2860(99)00173-810.1016/S0022-2860(99)00173-8 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.joca.2005.07.00810.1016/j.joca.2005.07.008 ↗
32. 10.1016/0141-8130(82)90047-210.1016/0141-8130(82)90047-2 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0141606410.1007/BF01416064 ↗
34. Senthil M.K. · J. Surg. Res. · 2008 · 158 · 162
35. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00187-910.1016/S0142-9612(01)00187-9 ↗