Experimental investigation and numerical analysis of the dynamic characteristics of a laminated hybrid composite bed
Source abstract
Abstract
To maximize the productivity of precise products in manufacturing industries, machine tools should be operated at high speeds. The machine tools should withstand higher cutting speeds, higher acceleration and deceleration and should be cost effective to give high quality products. The aforesaid expectations cannot be fulfilled simultaneously if conventional metal such as cast iron is employed. Hence, there is a need to replace cast iron with alternative materials. In the present work an attempt is made to replace the mini lathe bed made of cast iron with laminated hybrid composites, carbon, and glass/epoxy, to attain superior dynamic properties with less weight. The manufactured composite bed weighs 3.5 times less than that of the existing cast iron bed. Numerical and experimental modal analysis was done for both the cast iron and composite bed. The results show that the experimentally obtained fundamental natural frequency and damping ratio of composite bed are superior, 37% and 3 times, than that of the existing cast iron bed. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:20–26, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Anna University Chennai ‐600 025 Tamilnadu India
Department of Mechanical Engineering St. Joseph's College of Engineering Chennai ‐600 119 Tamilnadu India
Department of Mechanical Engineering CEG Campus, Anna University Chennai ‐600 025 Tamilnadu India
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.00310.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.003 ↗
2. Kalpakjian S. · 2009
3. 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62480-910.1016/S0007-8506(07)62480-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/0924-0136(94)01705-610.1016/0924-0136(94)01705-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.03.01210.1016/j.matdes.2006.03.012 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00225-210.1016/S0008-8846(99)00225-2 ↗
7. 10.3844/ajassp.2011.610.61610.3844/ajassp.2011.610.616 ↗
8. Abuthakeer S.S. · Int. J. Eng. · 2011 · 3 · 213
9. Cho S.K. · Compos. Struct. · 2011 · 4 · 92
10. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.15.8110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.15.81 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2003.10.021 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.09.00710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2005.09.007 ↗
13. 10.1016/0022-460X(92)90452-410.1016/0022-460X(92)90452-4 ↗
14. Aly M.F. · Int. J. Mech. Mechatr. Eng. · 2010 · 10 · 59
15. 10.1590/S1516-1439200100040001510.1590/S1516-14392001000400015 ↗
16. 10.1590/S1678-5878200300030001410.1590/S1678-58782003000300014 ↗
17. Slocum H.A. · 1992
18. C.L.Hale “Principles and Techniques for Designing Precision Machines ” Ph.D. Thesis M.I.T. Cambridge Massachusetts (1999).10.2172/8431 ↗
19. J.J.ZulaikaandF.J.Campa “New concepts for structural components ” inMachine Tools for High Performance Machining L.N. Lopez de Lacalle and A. Lamikiz Eds. Springer(2009).
20. MIL‐HDBK‐17‐3F. Military handbook polymer matrix composites. US Department of Defense (2002).
21. J.A.Bailie R.P.Ley andA.Pasricha A summary and review of composite laminate design guidelines. Technical report NASA NAS1‐19347 Northrop Grumman‐Military Aircraft Systems Division (1997).
22. Palm J.W. · 2007