Effects of defects on the interfacial shear characteristics between graphene and poly (methyl methacrylate)
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Pullout simulations were conducted to investigate the interfacial shear properties between defective graphene (DGr) and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) through molecular dynamics simulations with ReaxFF reactive force fields. The effects of number of defects (Stone‐Wales [SW] and double‐vacancy [DV] defects) were investigated. Our results showed that these two types of defects can obviously enhance the interfacial shear strengths of DGr /PMMA nanocomposites. And the DV defects have a greater contribution to the interfacial shear strength enhancement compared to the SW defects. Analysis of the morphology of DGr indicated that surface roughness, which was induced by defects, plays an important role in enhancing the interfacial shear strength at the interface between the DGr and PMMA. Moreover, the effects of chemical functionalization at the defect sites were also investigated. We observed that the CO bonds of functional groups (hydroxyls) at defect sites inclined from the datum plane (z = 0 plane) of the graphene sheet. The inclination of CO bonds, which weakened the mechanical interlocking between functional graphene and PMMA matrix, differently influenced by the DV defect and SW defect.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions Chongqing University Chongqing China
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Chongqing University Chongqing China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.12.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2013.12.004 ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20080177610.1002/adfm.200801776 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.326963710.1063/1.3269637 ↗
4. 10.1021/nn901047210.1021/nn9010472 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature0496910.1038/nature04969 ↗
6. 10.1002/pi.302510.1002/pi.3025 ↗
7. 10.1021/jp901284d10.1021/jp901284d ↗
8. 10.1021/nn102529n10.1021/nn102529n ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mattod.2016.11.00210.1016/j.mattod.2016.11.002 ↗
10. 10.1039/c4ra02907k10.1039/c4ra02907k ↗
11. Awasthi A. P. · 2009 · 15002
12. 10.1021/ma050176r10.1021/ma050176r ↗
13. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.02110.1016/j.carbon.2017.03.021 ↗
14. 10.1021/jp305658710.1021/jp3056587 ↗
15. 10.1021/ma501769310.1021/ma5017693 ↗
16. 10.1021/jp100110n10.1021/jp100110n ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.05610.1016/j.apsusc.2011.04.056 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.04710.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.047 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.487017010.1063/1.4870170 ↗
20. 10.1021/nn102598m10.1021/nn102598m ↗
21. 10.1016/0009-2614(86)80661-310.1016/0009-2614(86)80661-3 ↗
22. 10.1021/nl073267610.1021/nl0732676 ↗
23. 10.1039/C5RA04831A10.1039/C5RA04831A ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.02.00510.1016/j.jmps.2014.02.005 ↗
25. Ma J. · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 1132
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.07810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.078 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.09.02610.1016/j.commatsci.2016.09.026 ↗
28. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp709896w10.1021/jp709896w ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.05410310.1103/PhysRevB.81.054103 ↗
31. 10.1039/C7RA08243F10.1039/C7RA08243F ↗
32. 10.1021/jp312159v10.1021/jp312159v ↗
33. 10.3762/bjnano.5.1210.3762/bjnano.5.12 ↗
34. 10.1039/C6RA09292F10.1039/C6RA09292F ↗
35. 10.1038/nnano.2008.9610.1038/nnano.2008.96 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.02810.1016/j.compscitech.2016.12.028 ↗
37. 10.1002/smll.20120089410.1002/smll.201200894 ↗
38. 10.1115/1.403005210.1115/1.4030052 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.06.02310.1016/j.commatsci.2015.06.023 ↗
40. 10.1038/ncomms753910.1038/ncomms7539 ↗