Enhanced strength and toughness of polyurethane rubber by introducing hydrogen bond sacrificial units at rubber‐graphene interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
It is still a huge challenge to add a kind of filler into rubber toward strong yet tough elastomer. In this work, a biomimetic design for polyurethane rubber (PUR) by introducing hydrogen bond sacrificial units at the rubber‐graphene oxide interfaces was described. Poly(vinyl alcohol)‐g‐graphene oxide (PGO) reinforced PUR composites were prepared by mechanical blending. The grafting rate of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) on graphene oxide (GO) surface was 23.5%. The improved properties, including the tensile strength, elongation at break and thermal stability of the PUR/PGO composites compared to the virgin PUR vulcanizate were attributed to the hydrogen bonds between PUR and PGO. An 131.2% increase in the tensile strength, a 60.2% increase in the elongation at break and a 23.5°C increase in the maximum decomposition temperature were obtained by adding 1 phr PGO. In addition, the low temperature resistance of the PUR vulcanizate was improved with the addition of PGO. The mechanism of improved properties was attributed to the destruction and reconstitution of hydrogen bond sacrificial units in the PUR/PGO system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Chemical Engineering Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology Maoming China
College of Material Science Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology Maoming China
Funding
Foundation for Distinguished Young Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong · Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.12.01010.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.12.010 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.12.05710.1016/j.polymer.2016.12.057 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.08310.1016/j.carbon.2017.11.083 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10853-012-6913-110.1007/s10853-012-6913-1 ↗
6. 10.1039/c2jm16901k10.1039/c2jm16901k ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.10.05410.1016/j.polymer.2014.10.054 ↗
8. 10.1038/nmat270410.1038/nmat2704 ↗
9. 10.1529/biophysj.105.06934410.1529/biophysj.105.069344 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.03.00110.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.03.001 ↗
11. 10.1021/ma500934e10.1021/ma500934e ↗
12. 10.1038/nmat371310.1038/nmat3713 ↗
13. 10.1039/c3tb20647e10.1039/c3tb20647e ↗
14. 10.1002/pat.388610.1002/pat.3886 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.03.04810.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.03.048 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10853-016-9874-y10.1007/s10853-016-9874-y ↗
17. 10.1021/ma502239w10.1021/ma502239w ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.01.07710.1016/j.polymer.2016.01.077 ↗
19. 10.1002/marc.20160022610.1002/marc.201600226 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.aao035010.1126/science.aao0350 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0048310.1021/acs.macromol.7b00483 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.12.04810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.12.048 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.11.04810.1016/j.polymer.2014.11.048 ↗
24. 10.1021/ie402318r10.1021/ie402318r ↗
25. 10.1038/nmat179810.1038/nmat1798 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.11.05110.1016/j.vacuum.2018.11.051 ↗
27. Gong J. X. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2004 · 24 · 359
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.02310.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.023 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.013 ↗
30. Zhong X. O. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2013 · 130 · 447410.1002/app.39649 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.04210.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.042 ↗
32. 10.1002/pen.2199710.1002/pen.21997 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.11.03510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.11.035 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.08.00110.1016/j.mechmat.2010.08.001 ↗