Translaminar fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth characterization of carbon‐epoxy plain weave laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
An experimental investigation of mode‐I translaminar fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth behavior of a carbon fiber‐epoxy plain weave laminate manufactured by resin infusion under flexible tooling (RIFT) is presented in this article. Pre‐cracked compact tension (CT) specimens were used to perform both quasi‐static and fatigue tests. Different data reduction techniques for fracture toughness calculation were used and compared with each other. The ASTM E399 test method was modified to account for the material orthotropy and specimen geometry effects using a correction function based on a numerical evaluation of the strain energy release rate. The proposed modification shows good agreement against other experimental methods found in the literature and its application was validated for fatigue tests. Fatigue testing shows that failure in undesired modes is likely to occur prior to translaminar fracture, which was attributed to a higher tensile fatigue threshold than compression or shear fatigue threshold presented by the composite in analysis. Increasing the specimens’ initial notch length was a solution for avoiding these types of failure. The experimental results were compiled in the form of a Paris curve, and their particularities were discussed. A fractographic analysis was carried out to define damage patterns and its evolution process in both types of tests. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:3791–3804, 2019. © 2019 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aeronautical Engineering Technological Institute of Aeronautics, Praça Marechal do Ar Eduardo Gomes São Paulo Brazil
Lightweight Structures Laboratory Technology Park, Estrada Dr. Altino Bondensan São Paulo Brazil
Funding
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Harris C.E. · 1986 · 12410.1520/STP17392S ↗
2. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00047-X10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00047-X ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.007 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00011-210.1016/S0266-3538(01)00011-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.03.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.03.013 ↗
6. ASTM · 2013
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.12.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2006.12.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.01.00210.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.01.002 ↗
9. ASTM · 2015
10. O. F.Gomes Filho M. V.Donadon M. A.Arbelo in 21st ABCM International Congress of Mechanical Engineering Natal Brazil. (2011).
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.02.02910.1016/j.compscitech.2017.02.029 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.06.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2016.06.002 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.016 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.03710.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.037 ↗
15. 10.1163/156855191X0022510.1163/156855191X00225 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0298386010.1007/BF02983860 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.03210.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.032 ↗
18. ASTM · 2015
19. 10.1115/1.322648010.1115/1.3226480 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.010 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2008.02.031 ↗
22. S.L.Nascimento JuniorandM.V.Donadon in 3rd Brazilian Conference on Composite Materials Gramado Brazil (2016).
23. Dowling N.E. · 2012
24. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00092-110.1016/S0263-8223(00)00092-1 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.011 ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0055104110.1007/BF00551041 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.01.01010.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.01.010 ↗
28. Greenhalgh E. · 2009
29. 10.1179/14658019910154035810.1179/146580199101540358 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.10.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2015.10.020 ↗