Experimental characterization of creep behavior of laminated bamboo composites based on stepped isothermal method
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In the present research, the accelerated test using the stepped isothermal method (SIM) was applied to characterize the long‐term compressive behavior of laminated bamboo. Generating a creep master curve using the SIM data is somewhat empirical. In particular, the selection of the end and beginning segments in the rescaling process is not standardized, which will affect the determination of virtual time. The variability of the virtual time influences the construction of master curves, thus leading to errors in predicting long‐term behavior. The difference in selecting the end and beginning segments was studied in terms of the virtual time, rescaled isothermal curves, and master curves. A 40% end segment and a 30% beginning segment were recommended to build a more accurate master curve. The generated master curves showed repeatability and matched reasonably well with the conventional creep results. It indicates that SIM is a reliable tool for the accelerated test of the long‐term behavior of laminated bamboo. In addition, isochronous stress‐creep strain curves were constructed based on the master curves at different loadings to provide evidence to determine stress levels for structural design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bamboo properties and applications · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Wood Treatment and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Engineering Research Center of Biomaterials Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing Jiangsu China
School of Civil Engineering Southeast University Nanjing Jiangsu China
School of Architectural Engineering Jinling Institute of Technology Nanjing Jiangsu China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.07710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.077 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2673010.1002/pc.26730 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11379910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113799 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11875110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118751 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.08710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.087 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.01210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.012 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943‐5592.000008910.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943‐5592.0000089 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12804710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128047 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.05910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.059 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.05010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.050 ↗
11. T/CECE 10138–2021 · 2021
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11339810.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113398 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.27410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.274 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10471210.1016/j.jobe.2022.104712 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10552610.1016/j.jobe.2022.105526 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.11510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.115 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10125810.1016/j.jobe.2020.101258 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11379910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113799 ↗
19. Flexural performance of glued laminated bamboo beams
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.02410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.024 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10086‐016‐1579‐y10.1007/s10086‐016‐1579‐y ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10371010.1016/j.jobe.2021.103710 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10086‐017‐1683‐710.1007/s10086‐017‐1683‐7 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10210710.1016/j.jobe.2020.102107 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943‐5592.000060010.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943‐5592.0000600 ↗
26. ASTM D2990‐17 · 2017
27. ASTM D6112‐18 · 2018
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.02610.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.026 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.003 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.03910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.039 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11590610.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115906 ↗
32. ASTM D143‐14 · 2014
33. ThorntonJS PaulsonJN SandriD.Conventional and stepped isothermal methods for characterizing long term creep strength of polyester geogrids. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Geosynthetics 1998; 691–698.
34. 10.1007/s10853‐008‐2676‐010.1007/s10853‐008‐2676‐0 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10853‐011‐5743‐x10.1007/s10853‐011‐5743‐x ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.01.01410.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.01.014 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.09610.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.096 ↗
38. 10.1007/s00226‐018‐1037‐710.1007/s00226‐018‐1037‐7 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.01.00510.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.01.005 ↗
40. 10.1038/srep1111610.1038/srep11116 ↗
41. 10.1002/pc.2720710.1002/pc.27207 ↗
42. 10.1002/pc.2525310.1002/pc.25253 ↗
43. 10.1002/fam.294010.1002/fam.2940 ↗
44. 10.1177/0731684409335410.1177/07316844093354 ↗
45. 10.1007/s11043‐021‐09512‐110.1007/s11043‐021‐09512‐1 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.12492610.1016/j.polymer.2022.124926 ↗
47. 10.1002/app.3670710.1002/app.36707 ↗
48. Ferry JD · 1980
49. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9445(1992)118:8(2261)10.1061/(ASCE)0733‐9445(1992)118:8(2261) ↗