Nonisothermal crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid)/ramie fiber biocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and PLA/natural fiber composites are considered as environmentally friendly materials and are becoming one of the research hotspots. Many research achievements of PLA and its composites prefer to focus on modification and the macro‐properties of composites while there are few works on relationships between processing, structures, and properties. The ramie fiber (RF) reinforced PLA biological composites were prepared and PLA/RF injection‐molded samples were fabricated to investigate effects of RF percentage (0, 5 wt% RF, 10 wt% RF, 15 wt% RF, 20 wt% RF) on PLA crystallization, thermal and mechanical performance by experimental and numerical methods. Experimental and simulated results indicate that the RF serves as a kind of nucleation agent, accelerates the crystallization rate, shortens the half crystallization time of PLA. The degree of crystallinity is up to 16.2% when PLA is with 20 wt% RF. The half crystallization time of PLA with 5 wt% RF composite is reduced by up to 28%. Correspondingly, the tensile strength and Young's modulus of the PLA composites are also improved by the RF without sacrificing thermal stability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou China
School of Materials and Chemical Engineering Henan University of Urban Construction Pingdingshan China
Key Laboratory for Liquid‐Solid Structural Evolution & Processing of Materials (Ministry of Education) Shandong University Jinan China
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2636510.1002/pc.26365 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2638510.1002/pc.26385 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.04210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.042 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.06.04410.1016/j.polymer.2016.06.044 ↗
5. 10.1002/app.3932810.1002/app.39328 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2647210.1002/pc.26472 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2647510.1002/pc.26475 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.12.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2009.12.006 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2635410.1002/pc.26354 ↗
10. 10.1002/bip.2207910.1002/bip.22079 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.02010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.020 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2646410.1002/pc.26464 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.2525410.1002/pen.25254 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.11.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2004.11.004 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.2609010.1002/app.26090 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.10.02410.1016/j.msea.2009.10.024 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0072410.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00724 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2600010.1002/pc.26000 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.2600010.1002/pc.26000 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20130541310.1002/adma.201305413 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.macromol.9b0059510.1021/acs.macromol.9b00595 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.006 ↗
23. 10.1002/pat.388110.1002/pat.3881 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12255610.1016/j.polymer.2020.122556 ↗
25. 10.1002/pen.2466510.1002/pen.24665 ↗
26. 10.1002/app.4964810.1002/app.49648 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.5b0114510.1021/acsami.5b01145 ↗
28. 10.1007/BF0149892710.1007/BF01498927 ↗
29. 10.1016/0032-3861(86)90006-610.1016/0032-3861(86)90006-6 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2632810.1002/pc.26328 ↗
31. 10.1002/1097-4628(20000923)77:13<2865::AID-APP7>3.0.CO;2-210.1002/1097-4628(20000923)77:13<2865::AID-APP7>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2008.06.01010.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2008.06.010 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2328010.1002/pc.23280 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.008 ↗
35. 10.1002/pc.2646010.1002/pc.26460 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.06.00210.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.06.002 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2645010.1002/pc.26450 ↗
38. 10.1002/pc.2649610.1002/pc.26496 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.07510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.075 ↗