Accelerated aging effects in composites used as repair for pipes in oil industry
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Composites are often employed as repair materials for steel pipelines in the oil industry. Nevertheless, it is known that polymer matrix composites age through service life due to exposure to environmental factors, leading to a decrease in the durability of these repairs. In this work, alterations in glass fiber–epoxy composites aged for 1440, 2880, and 4320 h were studied in two different aging conditions: an accelerated aging chamber (with alternate cycles of exposure to ultraviolet [UV] radiation and water condensation) and immersed in salt water. The effects of aging in the material were evaluated by Fourier‐transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), lap‐shear tests, permeability analysis, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and in terms of mass variation. The results show that chemical changes, as well as alterations in mass and fiber exposure, increases in glass transition temperature and permeability, and more pronounced debonding composite/metal after lap‐shear tests, as compared to unaged materials, occurred. In general, the cycles of UV and water condensation were found to be more harmful to the material than aging in salt water, for the same exposure period.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Engineering Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal Brazil
Department of Mechanical Engineering Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal Brazil
Funding
CAPES · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Fortner B. · Civil Eng. · 1999 · 69 · 42
2. Jacobson G.A. · 2003
3. Greenwood C. · Pipeline Gas J. · 2001 · 228 · 58
4. 10.1007/BF0035157010.1007/BF00351570 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.004 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.07.01010.1016/j.matdes.2007.07.010 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.06.02510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.06.025 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.12.01310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.12.013 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.004 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.03.01510.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.03.015 ↗
11. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990801)73:5<795::AID-APP19>3.0.CO;2-510.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990801)73:5<795::AID-APP19>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.04.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2007.04.020 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.07210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.072 ↗
15. 10.1177/00219980276167551110.1177/002199802761675511 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00790-310.1016/S0032-3861(98)00790-3 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.08.02610.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.08.026 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.06.00410.1016/j.polymer.2010.06.004 ↗
19. Khoe C.K. · 2011
20. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.06.00910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.06.009 ↗
21. 10.1590/1679-7825176010.1590/1679-78251760 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.07.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.07.008 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10924-009-0138-710.1007/s10924-009-0138-7 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.06.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.06.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.10.01010.1016/j.wasman.2007.10.010 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.05.01010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.05.010 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.08.01510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.08.015 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.05610.1016/j.compositesb.2015.08.056 ↗
29. 10.1155/2015/37235410.1155/2015/372354 ↗
30. 10.1177/073168441245998310.1177/0731684412459983 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.01.01010.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.01.010 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.12.02310.1016/j.jcis.2005.12.023 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.03810.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.038 ↗
34. 10.1177/002199831558045110.1177/0021998315580451 ↗
35. 10.1002/app.4712110.1002/app.47121 ↗
36. González M. G. · Infrared Spectrosc. Mater. Sci. Eng. Technol. · 2012 · 2 · 261
37. 10.1155/2014/51547010.1155/2014/515470 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10853-010-5005-310.1007/s10853-010-5005-3 ↗
39. 10.1016/S0141-3910(98)00018-410.1016/S0141-3910(98)00018-4 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.12.01610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.12.016 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.02.02410.1016/j.matlet.2006.02.024 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00044-010.1016/S0142-1123(02)00044-0 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10562810.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105628 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00791-510.1016/S0032-3861(98)00791-5 ↗
45. 10.1002/app.1044710.1002/app.10447 ↗
46. 10.1007/978-1-4615-7139-1_510.1007/978-1-4615-7139-1_5 ↗
47. 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90010-E10.1016/0266-3538(93)90010-E ↗
48. A.Maxwell S.Roberts Review of Data on Gas Migration through Polymer Encapsulants Report to NDA (2008).
49. Duncan B. · 2005
50. 10.1177/073168441350500910.1177/0731684413505009 ↗
51. 10.1177/00219983930270120110.1177/002199839302701201 ↗
52. 10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00135-010.1016/S1359-835X(03)00135-0 ↗