Preparation and properties of chitosan/organic‐modified attapulgite composite proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The chitosan (CS) matrix‐based composite proton exchange membranes (CS/QATP) were prepared by the incorporation of organic‐modified attapulgite (QATP) into CS, through an organic‐inorganic composite synthesis method. The QATP was obtained by the modification with silane coupling agent (octadecyldimethyl [3‐trimethoxysilylpropyl] ammonium chloride). The morphology, crystallinity, thermal and mechanical property, dimensional stability, and proton conductivity of CS/QATP composite membranes were investigated. The compatibility and dispersibility of QATP in CS matrix were significantly improved with enhanced interfacial interaction. The dimensional and thermal stability of the CS/QATP composite membranes were improved compared with pure CS film, owing to good dispersion and lower water uptake. Especially, the composite membrane with 2 wt% QATP (CS/QATP‐2) exhibits the highest mechanical strength and proton conductivity, which is much higher than pure CS film. These results indicated that CS/QATP composite membranes have a great potential for proton exchange membranes applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Biomass Conversion and Utilization, Hubei Engineering & Technology Research Center for Functional Material from Biomass, School of Chemistry and Material Science Hubei Engineering University Xiaogan China
Funding
Hubei Provincial Department of Education
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr030441b10.1021/cr030441b ↗
2. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.02710.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.027 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.07.00410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.07.004 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.04.03010.1016/j.jiec.2014.04.030 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.11.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.11.004 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.12.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.12.005 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.16510.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.165 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.00610.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.006 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.07.01910.1016/j.memsci.2007.07.019 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.10.01510.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.10.015 ↗
12. 10.1021/ie51403a01210.1021/ie51403a012 ↗
13. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0582310.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05823 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.02710.1016/j.jcis.2019.03.027 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matchar.2006.04.02410.1016/j.matchar.2006.04.024 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.09610.1016/j.cej.2012.08.096 ↗
17. Feng H. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2015 · 132 · 4140710.1002/app.41407 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11664-018-06876-y10.1007/s11664-018-06876-y ↗
19. 10.1002/app.2520710.1002/app.25207 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.06710.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.067 ↗
21. 10.1039/C5RA21791A10.1039/C5RA21791A ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2237310.1002/pc.22373 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.03210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.032 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.clay.2015.06.02910.1016/j.clay.2015.06.029 ↗
25. Bradley W. F. · Am. Mineral. · 1940 · 25 · 405
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.07610.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.076 ↗
27. 10.1002/app.4690410.1002/app.46904 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.07510.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.075 ↗
29. 10.1002/ejic.20120151310.1002/ejic.201201513 ↗
30. 10.1002/fuce.20130013010.1002/fuce.201300130 ↗
31. 10.1021/sc500576410.1021/sc5005764 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.07.04510.1016/j.memsci.2008.07.045 ↗
33. 10.1002/anie.19820208110.1002/anie.198202081 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.03.00710.1016/j.memsci.2007.03.007 ↗