Effects of thermal histories on carbon fiber/polyamide 6 microcomposite load transfer efficiency: Crystallization, modulus, and measurement
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, load transfer efficiency (LTE) is quantitatively expressed as a specific formula and characterized through electrical resistance method. Single carbon fiber (CF) reinforced polyamide 6 (PA6) microcomposites with eight different thermal histories were prepared. Polarizing optical microscope (POM) was used to observe crystal morphologies. Tensile properties of neat PA6 with different thermal histories were tested. All the above results show that electrical resistance method is an effective way to characterize CF/PA6 microcomposite interface LTE. Water quenched CF/PA6 microcomposites have a highest LTE of 94.2%, while LTE decreased to 34.3% at the bottom for 200°C annealing treated specimens. POM results show that decreasing nonisothermal cooling rate results in larger spherulites and transcrystallites but lower nucleus density, while annealing treated samples nearly have no change and still keep quite transparent. It is also very interesting to find that there is an antisymmetric relationship between LTE and matrix modulus of nonisothermal/isothermal crystallization samples, and LTE drops more for the annealing treated specimens under the similar modulus, which ascribes to radial residual stress releasing during annealing treatment. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:102–109, 2018. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Beihang University Beijing 100191 China
School of Transportation Science and Engineering Beihang University Beijing 100191 China
Funding
National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program)
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Markarian J. · Plast. Eng. · 2011 · 9 · 22
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.025 ↗
3. 10.1177/00219983910250080110.1177/002199839102500801 ↗
4. 10.1177/00219983910250080210.1177/002199839102500802 ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0057537510.1007/BF00575375 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.015 ↗
7. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00009-910.1016/S1359-835X(00)00009-9 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.1010310.1002/pc.10103 ↗
9. Waterbury M.C. · 1990 · 731
10. Nielsen A.S. · 1998
11. 10.1080/0022234960822039310.1080/00222349608220393 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0115448210.1007/BF01154482 ↗
13. 10.1515/SECM.1998.7.1-2.110.1515/SECM.1998.7.1-2.1 ↗
14. Beehag A. · 1997 · 723
15. 10.1007/BF0042266110.1007/BF00422661 ↗
16. 10.1016/0032-3861(87)90443-510.1016/0032-3861(87)90443-5 ↗
17. Gao S.L. · 1999
18. 10.1023/A:102186642939410.1023/A:1021866429394 ↗
19. 10.1016/0010-4361(95)91137-T10.1016/0010-4361(95)91137-T ↗
20. Nielsen A.S. · Compos. Interfaces · 1999 · 6 · 46710.1163/156855499X00152 ↗
21. 10.1002/pat.1991.22002030210.1002/pat.1991.220020302 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.1020210.1002/pc.10202 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.07.00110.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.07.001 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00082-710.1016/S1359-835X(98)00082-7 ↗
25. 10.1016/0143-7496(81)90025-710.1016/0143-7496(81)90025-7 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.02.05010.1016/j.polymer.2013.02.050 ↗
27. 10.1016/0266-3538(87)90059-510.1016/0266-3538(87)90059-5 ↗
28. Guar U. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 1989 · 34 · 3510.1016/0266-3538(89)90076-6 ↗
29. 10.1016/0266-3538(91)90018-K10.1016/0266-3538(91)90018-K ↗
30. 10.1002/pen.76031190710.1002/pen.760311907 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00396-011-2428-610.1007/s00396-011-2428-6 ↗
32. 10.1021/ma902865e10.1021/ma902865e ↗
33. 10.1021/ma102249910.1021/ma1022499 ↗
34. Meng H. · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 25 · 145
35. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.08.01810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.08.018 ↗
36. Landro L.D. · Composites A · 1996 · 27 · 84710.1016/1359-835X(96)00046-2 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00204-010.1016/S0008-8846(00)00204-0 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.03.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2006.03.002 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.019 ↗
40. Wang K. · Compos. Interface Lett. · 2001 · 8 · 43510.1163/156855401753424479 ↗
41. 10.1557/JMR.1999.010510.1557/JMR.1999.0105 ↗
42. 10.1007/BF0119763810.1007/BF01197638 ↗
43. 10.1007/BF0119763910.1007/BF01197639 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00140-810.1016/S0032-3861(99)00140-8 ↗
45. 10.1002/pen.76032040810.1002/pen.760320408 ↗
46. Yang W.J. · J. East China Univ. Sci. Technol. · 1998 · 24 · 675
47. Zhang Y.S. · Acta Polym. Sin. · 2010 · 2 · 23110.3724/SP.J.1105.2010.00231 ↗
48. Wu T.M. · Polym. Eng. Sci. · 2002 · 6 · 1141
49. Wu T.M. · Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 201 · 2820
50. 10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00759-510.1016/S0032-3861(01)00759-5 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00101-010.1016/S0032-3861(03)00101-0 ↗
52. 10.1007/BF0110571310.1007/BF01105713 ↗
53. Kim J.K. · 1998
54. 10.1007/BF0034903710.1007/BF00349037 ↗
55. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.55-57.30310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.55-57.303 ↗
56. Chamis C.C. · 1972
57. 10.1007/BF0054293110.1007/BF00542931 ↗
58. 10.1177/07316840212898847210.1177/073168402128988472 ↗
59. 10.1177/00219983980320040310.1177/002199839803200403 ↗
60. 10.1002/pc.75013020410.1002/pc.750130204 ↗