Dielectric properties of onion‐like carbon and detonation nanodiamond/polydimethysiloxane composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Results of dielectric investigations of onion‐like carbon (OLC) and detonation nanodiamond (DND)/polydimethysiloxane composites in wide frequency (20 Hz–3 THz) and temperatures (26–300 K) ranges are presented. The percolation threshold in OLC composites is 6.8 vol%. Electrical conduction in the OLC composites above the percolation threshold occurs mainly due to electron tunneling between OLC clusters and quasi‐one‐dimensional hopping inside the clusters. Hopping almost vanishes at frequencies above 100 GHz, where phonon contribution to the dielectric permittivity dominates. At low concentrations of nanocarbon particles (concentrations below the percolation threshold for OLC), the dielectric properties of the OLC and DND composites are similar. However, DNDs provide a noticeable improvement of the mechanical properties of the composites, in contrast with OLC. Therefore, a combination of the two nanomaterials in the composites could be beneficial. POLYM. COMPOS., 36:2084–2092, 2015. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineer
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dielectric materials and actuators · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Physical Sciences and Technology, A. Gostauto 11, LT‐01108 Vilnius Lithuania
Radiophysics department, Faculty of Physics, Vilnius University, Sauletekio Ave. 9, LT‐10222 Vilnius Lithuania
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS, Lavrentiev Ave. 5 Novosibirsk 630090 Russia
Radiophysical Department, National Tomsk State University Tomsk Russia
International Technology Center, Raleigh North Carolina 27715 USA
Funding
European Social Fund
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.45.57410.1103/RevModPhys.45.574 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.018 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.175510.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1755 ↗
4. 10.1038/nbt0708-77410.1038/nbt0708-774 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00135-X10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00135-X ↗
6. 10.1016/j.diamond.2009.11.01110.1016/j.diamond.2009.11.011 ↗
7. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/11/11570610.1088/0957-4484/19/11/115706 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.14410610.1103/PhysRevB.70.144106 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.322418710.1063/1.3224187 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.02610.1016/j.compscitech.2009.12.026 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.6910.1103/PhysRevLett.36.69 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.81910.1103/PhysRevE.52.819 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.49410.1103/PhysRevLett.69.494 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.119710.1103/PhysRevLett.40.1197 ↗
15. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.15310.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.153 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.02.04310.1016/j.matlet.2009.02.043 ↗
17. 10.1038/nnano.2011.20910.1038/nnano.2011.209 ↗
18. 10.1116/1.325815610.1116/1.3258156 ↗
19. 10.1116/1.472431010.1116/1.4724310 ↗
20. 10.1039/c3tc00423f10.1039/c3tc00423f ↗
21. Grigas J. · 1996
22. 10.1021/la051352s10.1021/la051352s ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20060070310.1002/adma.200600703 ↗
24. Jonscher A.K. · 1996
25. 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.06.05010.1016/j.cplett.2010.06.050 ↗
26. 10.1002/pssb.222076020510.1002/pssb.2220760205 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.08010.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.080 ↗
28. Fogel H. · Z. Phys. · 1921 · 22 · 645
29. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1925.tb16731.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1925.tb16731.x ↗
30. 10.1080/0022233820806326110.1080/00222338208063261 ↗
31. Bartlet P. · Polym. Bull. · 1987 · 17 · 97
32. 10.1002/masy.1987009011910.1002/masy.19870090119 ↗
33. 10.1021/nl02555410.1021/nl025554 ↗
34. 10.1016/0167-2738(83)90079-610.1016/0167-2738(83)90079-6 ↗
35. Mott N.F. · 1971