journal article·2023-08Open access

Mechanical performance of carbon fiber‐reinforced polymer cellular structures manufactured via fused filament fabrication

Mehmet Kepenekci, Bahar Gharehpapagh, Ulas Yaman, Sezer Özerinç

Polymer Composites· Volume 44· Issue 8

Abstract

Abstract This article investigates the mechanical behavior of polyamide and carbon fiber‐reinforced (CFR) polyamide structures produced by Fused Filament Fabrication. CFR improves solid polyamide's tensile strength and modulus by more than 200% and 800%, respectively. The enhancement is highest in the parallel raster due to the alignment of the fibers in the printing direction. The compression tests of gyroid, honeycomb, and Voronoi cellular structures revealed the effect of geometry and fiber reinforcement on energy absorption performance. CFR gyroid infill offers the best performance with a specific energy absorption capacity reaching 10 kJ/kg and an efficiency close to 50%. Fiber reinforcement improves energy absorption by a factor of four or higher while increasing the weight by only 10%. The energy absorption capacity of the reinforced polyamide offers enormous potential for developing new lightweight load‐bearing and impact‐absorbing structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering Middle East Technical University Ankara Turkey

Department of Micro and Nanotechnology Middle East Technical University Ankara Turkey

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/16864360.2015.111439310.1080/16864360.2015.1114393 ↗
2. 10.1186/s10033‐019‐0368‐010.1186/s10033‐019‐0368‐0 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2627510.1002/pc.26275 ↗
4. 10.1108/RPJ‐03‐2020‐006110.1108/RPJ‐03‐2020‐0061 ↗
5. 10.1146/annurev‐matsci‐070115‐03162410.1146/annurev‐matsci‐070115‐031624 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mattod.2022.05.00810.1016/j.mattod.2022.05.008 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11665‐021‐05832‐y10.1007/s11665‐021‐05832‐y ↗
8. 10.3390/jcs501002910.3390/jcs5010029 ↗
9. 10.1007/978‐981‐16‐7377‐1_710.1007/978‐981‐16‐7377‐1_7 ↗
10. 10.1108/0144515031050119010.1108/01445150310501190 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.11.00710.1016/j.addma.2016.11.007 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.029 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1104050010.3390/ma11040500 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10594810.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105948 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1403046510.3390/polym14030465 ↗
16. 10.1016/b978‐0‐12‐821090‐1.00008‐910.1016/b978‐0‐12‐821090‐1.00008‐9 ↗
17. 10.1002/978111822906410.1002/9781118229064 ↗
18. 10.1533/978184569460910.1533/9781845694609 ↗
19. 10.1002/pen.2451510.1002/pen.24515 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10041310.1016/j.coco.2020.100413 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10734110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107341 ↗
22. HasçelikS ÖztürkÖT ÖzerinçS.Mechanical properties of nylon parts produced by fused deposition modeling.2021.
23. 10.1002/app.4970910.1002/app.49709 ↗
24. 10.1108/RPJ‐11‐2020‐029610.1108/RPJ‐11‐2020‐0296 ↗
25. 10.3390/ma1303067210.3390/ma13030672 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.013 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.02710.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.027 ↗
28. 10.1177/146442071879519710.1177/1464420718795197 ↗
29. 10.1002/pc.2598510.1002/pc.25985 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.01210.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.012 ↗
32. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2679210.1002/pc.26792 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20140180410.1002/adma.201401804 ↗
35. 10.1002/adfm.20140045110.1002/adfm.201400451 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0022‐5096(01)00010‐210.1016/S0022‐5096(01)00010‐2 ↗
37. Ultrafuse PAHT CF15 technical datasheet ultrafuse® PAHT CF15 TDS.2020.
38. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics ASTM D638‐14.2015.
39. Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid cellular plastics ASTM D1621‐16.2016.
40. 10.1007/s40964‐021‐00249‐410.1007/s40964‐021‐00249‐4 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.coco.2020.10047810.1016/j.coco.2020.100478 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10235910.1016/j.addma.2021.102359 ↗
43. 10.3390/ma1523869810.3390/ma15238698 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10081010.1016/j.addma.2019.100810 ↗
45. 10.1088/0957‐4484/27/49/49530210.1088/0957‐4484/27/49/495302 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.028 ↗
47. 10.1155/2020/671409710.1155/2020/6714097 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.08.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2011.08.013 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10900710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109007 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.008 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.03.02310.1016/j.compositesb.2013.03.023 ↗
52. 10.1002/app.4815410.1002/app.48154 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00060-910.1016/S0734-743X(00)00060-9 ↗
54. 10.1080/15376494.2021.191980310.1080/15376494.2021.1919803 ↗
55. 10.3390/met1207118910.3390/met12071189 ↗