Pulsatile Chemotherapeutic Delivery Profiles Using Magnetically Responsive Hydrogels
Source abstract
Abstract
Pulsatile chemotherapeutic delivery profiles may provide a number advantages by maximizing the anticancer toxicity of chemotherapeutics, reducing off-target side effects, and combating adaptive resistance. While these temporally dynamic deliveries have shown some promise, they have yet to be clinically deployed from implantable hydrogels, whose localized deliveries could further enhance therapeutic outcomes. Here, several pulsatile chemotherapeutic delivery profiles were tested on melanoma cell survival in vitro and compared to constant (flatline) delivery profiles of the same integrated dose. Results indicated that pulsatile delivery profiles were more efficient at killing melanoma cells than flatline deliveries. Furthermore, results suggested that parameters like the duration of drug "on" periods (pulse width), delivery rates during those periods (pulse heights), and the number/frequency of pulses could be used to optimize delivery profiles. Optimization of pulsatile profiles at tumor sites in vivo would require hydrogel materials capable of producing a wide variety of pulsatile profiles (e.g., of different pulse heights, pulse widths, and pulse numbers). This work goes on to demonstrate that magnetically responsive, biphasic ferrogels are capable of producing pulsatile mitoxantrone delivery profiles similar to those tested in vitro. Pulse parameters such as the timing and rate of delivery during "on" periods could be remotely regulated through the use of simple, hand-held magnets. The timing of pulses was controlled simply by deciding when and for how long to magnetically stimulate. The rate of release during pulse "on" periods was a function of the magnetic stimulation frequency. These findings add to the growing evidence that pulsatile chemotherapeutic delivery profiles may be therapeutically beneficial and suggest that magnetically responsive hydrogels could provide useful tools for optimizing and clinically deploying pulsatile chemotherapeutic delivery profiles.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881, United States
Department of Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 028881, United States
Funding
Office of Integrative Activities · 3M · Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems · National Institute of General Medical Sciences · Rhode Island Foundation · College of Engineering, University of Rhode Island
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2017; American Cancer Society: Atlanta, 2017.
2. 10.1016/S0169-409X(97)00036-710.1016/S0169-409X(97)00036-7 ↗
3. 10.1023/A:102578550597710.1023/A:1025785505977 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat375810.1038/nmat3758 ↗
5. Vernon B. · 2004 · 1 · 384
6. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.01110.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.011 ↗
7. Alam S. · Clinical proceedings from association of reproductive health professionals · 2008 · 7
8. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. IMPLANON (etonogestrel implant); Merck & Co., Inc.: 2017.
9. 10.1016/j.addr.2006.01.01610.1016/j.addr.2006.01.016 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.042 ↗
11. 10.1080/1071754090299965310.1080/10717540902999653 ↗
12. 10.1038/nature0379410.1038/nature03794 ↗
13. 10.1245/s10434-008-0048-210.1245/s10434-008-0048-2 ↗
14. 10.1093/neuonc/5.2.7910.1093/neuonc/5.2.79 ↗
15. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. ZOLADEX (goserelin acetate implant) 10.8 mg; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP: 2013.
16. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04175.x10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04175.x ↗
17. Kleiner L. W. · 2013 · 106210.1016/B978-0-08-087780-8.00099-1 ↗
18. 10.1163/15685620432279353910.1163/156856204322793539 ↗
19. 10.1002/cncr.1104010.1002/cncr.11040 ↗
20. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970117)70:2<241::AID-IJC16>3.0.CO;2-L10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970117)70:2<241::AID-IJC16>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
21. 10.1023/A:100838970672510.1023/A:1008389706725 ↗
22. 10.1038/ncomms713910.1038/ncomms7139 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.00610.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006 ↗
24. 10.1002/adhm.20130026010.1002/adhm.201300260 ↗
25. 10.1073/pnas.100786210810.1073/pnas.1007862108 ↗
26. 10.1002/adhm.20140009510.1002/adhm.201400095 ↗
27. 10.1021/ma070758410.1021/ma0707584 ↗
28. 10.1002/jbm.82019010710.1002/jbm.820190107 ↗
29. 10.1073/pnas.78.3.186310.1073/pnas.78.3.1863 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.06.00210.1016/j.jconrel.2007.06.002 ↗
31. 10.1021/la060371e10.1021/la060371e ↗
32. 10.1002/jbm.82021120210.1002/jbm.820211202 ↗
33. 10.1073/pnas.140546911110.1073/pnas.1405469111 ↗
34. 10.1002/adhm.20150025410.1002/adhm.201500254 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.00810.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.008 ↗
36. 10.1073/pnas.151751711310.1073/pnas.1517517113 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.04910.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.049 ↗
38. 10.1212/WNL.63.12_suppl_6.S1510.1212/WNL.63.12_suppl_6.S15 ↗
39. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03358-810.1016/S0140-6736(97)03358-8 ↗
40. 10.2165/00003088-199018050-0000310.2165/00003088-199018050-00003 ↗
41. 10.1126/science.116016510.1126/science.1160165 ↗
42. 10.1126/science.111659810.1126/science.1116598 ↗