Characterization of Roselle fiber composites for low load bearing structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The influence of weaving architecture on mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of woven roselle fiber epoxy composite has been investigated. Plain, twill, satin, and basket type weaving patterns are considered for this study. Hand lay‐up process is used to produce the woven composites. Mechanical tests (tensile, flexural, and impact test) and dynamic mechanical analysis are conducted according to ASTM standards for material characterization. Results revealed that basket type architecture of woven roselle fiber epoxy composite has better tensile, flexural, and impact strengths. Woven composites have improved storage modulus in comparison with neat epoxy. Woven composites have 3% to 15% lower glass transition temperature than that of neat epoxy. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis is carried out to correlate the experimental findings. SEM images showed evidence of fiber pullout and cracks near fiber bundle, which indicates non‐uniform transfer of stress from fiber to the matrix.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation Vaddeswaram India
Department of Mechanical Engineering MVJ College of Engineering Bengaluru India
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/073168441561197310.1177/0731684415611973 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10924-011-0410-510.1007/s10924-011-0410-5 ↗
3. 10.15376/biores.13.1.1951-196010.15376/biores.13.1.1951-1960 ↗
4. 10.1177/152808371667915710.1177/1528083716679157 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jksus.2015.09.00510.1016/j.jksus.2015.09.005 ↗
6. 10.1177/096739111984755210.1177/0967391119847552 ↗
7. Vijayan R. · Int. J. Mech. Prod Eng. Res. Dev. · 2018 · 8 · 303
8. 10.1177/152808371664876410.1177/1528083716648764 ↗
9. 10.1080/15440478.2018.143182810.1080/15440478.2018.1431828 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.06210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.062 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12034-015-0999-410.1007/s12034-015-0999-4 ↗
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.766-767.11010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.766-767.110 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.06710.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.067 ↗
14. 10.3390/polym1012132010.3390/polym10121320 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.02910.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.029 ↗
16. 10.15282/jmes.9.2015.15.016310.15282/jmes.9.2015.15.0163 ↗
17. 10.1177/073168441455986410.1177/0731684414559864 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.015 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.04710.1016/j.msea.2011.03.047 ↗
20. 10.1177/073168440809034210.1177/0731684408090342 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2312710.1002/pc.23127 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2284610.1002/pc.22846 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.07910.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.079 ↗
24. 10.1080/0360255050037403810.1080/03602550500374038 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2006310.1002/pc.20063 ↗
26. Rashid A. H. A. · Appl. Mech. Mater. · 2013 · 271 · 81
27. 10.1007/s11029-014-9424-010.1007/s11029-014-9424-0 ↗
28. Yuhazri M. Y. · IOP Conf Ser Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2016 · 160
29. Saiman M. P. · Proc. Int. Colloq Text Eng. Fash Appar Des · 2014 · 2014 · 25
30. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.660.12510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.660.125 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.473248110.1063/1.4732481 ↗