Facile fabrication and performance comparison of aramid‐nanofiber membrane formed by water or ethanol
Source abstract
Abstract
Favorable mechanical strength, thermal stability and transparency are important to polymeric composite membranes. Addressed herein is a facile fabrication and performance comparison of aramid nanofiber (ANF) membrane formed by water or ethanol. FTIR and XRD showed that no structural damage occurred in ANFs despite reduction in diameter. Both the two kinds of membrane demonstrated extraordinary thermal stability with a decomposition at above 500°C. High mechanical strength and different hydrophilic characteristics pave a way for expanding composites membranes with considerable attractive functionality. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:2534–2538, 2019. © 2019 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
MIIT Key Laboratory of Critical Materials Technology for New Energy Conversion and Storage School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin, 150001 China
Funding
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.desal.2013.06.01610.1016/j.desal.2013.06.016 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11665-016-2350-710.1007/s11665-016-2350-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.12.02810.1016/j.apsusc.2012.12.028 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.05010.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.050 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2016.04.015 ↗
6. 10.1021/bm101330w10.1021/bm101330w ↗
7. 10.1080/0360255870807193810.1080/03602558708071938 ↗
8. 10.1149/2.1531709jes10.1149/2.1531709jes ↗
9. 10.1149/2.0881714jes10.1149/2.0881714jes ↗
10. 10.1039/C7DT03003G10.1039/C7DT03003G ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.04210.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.042 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.08310.1016/j.polymer.2017.07.083 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.00910.1016/j.polymer.2017.09.009 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b0283510.1021/acs.iecr.7b02835 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.10.03510.1016/j.polymer.2017.10.035 ↗
16. 10.1039/C7TC02948A10.1039/C7TC02948A ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.02310.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.023 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00610.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.006 ↗
19. 10.1039/C4TB01258E10.1039/C4TB01258E ↗
20. 10.1039/C5CP00413F10.1039/C5CP00413F ↗
21. 10.1038/srep0848010.1038/srep08480 ↗
22. 10.1039/C4TB01944J10.1039/C4TB01944J ↗
23. 10.1002/smll.20120209010.1002/smll.201202090 ↗
24. 10.1021/nl504358j10.1021/nl504358j ↗
25. 10.1002/smll.20120042110.1002/smll.201200421 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b0055710.1021/acs.accounts.5b00557 ↗
27. Chu C.K. · Fibres Text. East. Eur. · 2010 · 83 · 63
28. 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.05710.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.057 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.19890649110.1002/anie.198906491 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.triboint.2008.06.00410.1016/j.triboint.2008.06.004 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00074-910.1016/S0266-3538(00)00074-9 ↗
32. 10.1021/nn201400310.1021/nn2014003 ↗
33. 10.1021/am508236410.1021/am5082364 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20120246610.1002/adfm.201202466 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0885610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b08856 ↗
36. 10.1039/c2nr31907a10.1039/c2nr31907a ↗