journal article·2019-08

Comparative fractographic analysis of composites adhesive joints subjected to mode I delamination

Núbia N. A. Silveira, Rita C. M. Sales, Camila B. G. Brito, Geraldo M. Cândido, Maurício V. Donadon

Polymer Composites· Volume 40· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Adhesive bonding technologies for thermosetting polymer composites have been applied in several industrial sectors, such as marine, automobile, construction, and aeronautical industries due to their excellent mechanical behavior over conventional joining methods. One of the main drawbacks of this joining technology is that they are prone to delamination whilst in service. The overall composite joint structural performance depends upon several factors related to the joint manufacturing process such as surfaces preparation procedure, loading condition, adhesive type, aging effects, and inspection procedures. For this reason, there is clear need to better understand how the joint behavior is affected by these factors and the failure causes in order to improve the design and the joint performance. Within this context, this work presents a comparative fractographic analysis for two different joints types named co‐bonded and secondary bonded tested under Mode I delamination at room temperature. One sample of each was observed through fractographic analysis, to identify similarities and differences between the fracture aspects, which may explain differences in toughness values and fracture behaviors. The main contribution of this article is a new failure analysis methodology focused on a better understanding on failure characteristics of adhesive joints providing a deep and critical insight into main failure mechanisms and damage sequence in composite bonded joints, which may aid analytical validation and numerical models for this type of joints developed elsewhere. Although fracture toughness (GIc) values of each joint are quite similar, some failure aspects and adhesion mechanisms differentiate these two bonding technologies. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:2973–2983, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Material Properties and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Instituto Tecnológico da Aeronáutica, Praça Marechal do Ar Eduardo Gomes, Vila das Acácias CEP 12228‐900 São José dos Campos/SP Brazil

Faculdade de Tecnologia de São José dos Campos Prof. Jessen Vidal São José dos Campos Brazil

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1533/9781845698058.3.35010.1533/9781845698058.3.350 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.02510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.025 ↗
3. 10.1016/0142-1123(79)90022-710.1016/0142-1123(79)90022-7 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00006-310.1016/S0143-7496(00)00006-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.023 ↗
6. T.Kruse “The 19th International Conference on Composite Materials” Montreal (2013).
7. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.018 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.01410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.014 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.09.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.09.005 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.37.31710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.37.317 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.03810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.038 ↗
13. 10.2514/1.4179110.2514/1.41791 ↗
14. 10.1016/0266-3538(91)90054-S10.1016/0266-3538(91)90054-S ↗
15. N.N.A.Silveira R.C.M.Sales C.B.G.Brito G.M.Cândido andM.V.Donadon “24th ABCM International Congress of Mechanical Engineering” Curitiba (2017).
16. 10.1163/156855196X0030110.1163/156855196X00301 ↗
17. Bonneau M.R. · US Patent · 2011 · 8 · 080,313
18. Balzani C. · Intern. J. of Adhes. Adhesiv. · 2012 · 32 · 23
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.04110.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.041 ↗
20. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-080510.1590/1980-5373-mr-2016-0805 ↗
21. Greenhalgh E. · 2009
22. 10.1016/1044-5803(94)90045-010.1016/1044-5803(94)90045-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/0010-4361(81)90012-410.1016/0010-4361(81)90012-4 ↗
24. 10.1179/14658019910154035810.1179/146580199101540358 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)80028-110.1016/S1359-6454(98)80028-1 ↗
26. American Society for Testing and Materials D5528. West Conshohocken PA (2013).
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.006 ↗
28. American Society for Testing and Materials D5573. West Conshohocken PA (2012).
29. 10.1016/0010-4361(86)90746-910.1016/0010-4361(86)90746-9 ↗
30. 10.1177/002199831667949910.1177/0021998316679499 ↗
31. Tavara L. · 2010 · 247
32. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.024 ↗
33. Garg A.C. · 1988 · 179
34. 10.1007/978-3-319-55411-210.1007/978-3-319-55411-2 ↗
35. Marumoto M. · U.S. Patent · 1992 · 108 · 458
36. Minami H. · U.S. Patent · 1989 · 880 · 881