Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene terephthalate)/glass fiber composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The influences of the glass fiber (GF) content and the cooling rate for nonisothermal crystallization process of poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PBT/PET) blends were investigated. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of samples were detected by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at cooling rates of 5°C/min, 10°C/min, 15°C/min, 20°C/min, 25°C/min, respectively. The Jeziony and Mozhishen methods were used to analyze the DSC data. The crystalline morphology of samples was observed with polarized light microscope. Results showed that the Jeziony and Mozhishen methods were available for the analysis of the nonisothermal crystallization process. The peaks of crystallization temperature ( T p ) move to low temperature with the cooling rate increasing, crystallization half‐time ( t 1/2 ) decrease accordingly. The crystallization rate of PBT/PET blends increase with the lower GF contents while it is baffled by higher GF contents. POLYM. COMPOS. 36:510–516, 2015. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Henan Provincial Key Laboratory of Surface and Interface Science Department of Material and Chemical Engineering Zhengzhou University of Light Industry Zhengzhou China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991114)74:7<1797::AID-APP23>3.0.CO;2-E10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991114)74:7<1797::AID-APP23>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
2. 10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00097-910.1016/S0032-3861(97)00097-9 ↗
3. 10.1002/pen.1121910.1002/pen.11219 ↗
4. 10.1002/app.1987.07033030610.1002/app.1987.070330306 ↗
5. 10.1002/polc.507063012610.1002/polc.5070630126 ↗
6. 10.1016/0032-3861(92)90866-U10.1016/0032-3861(92)90866-U ↗
7. Sepe M. · Plast. Technol. · 2012 · 58 · 17
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.08110.1016/j.msea.2010.10.081 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.06.00210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.06.002 ↗
10. Klimkeit B. · Proceedings of ICMFF9 (Parma, Italy) · 2010
11. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.12.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.12.004 ↗
12. 10.1177/00219983920260150510.1177/002199839202601505 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.2201710.1002/app.22017 ↗
14. 10.1016/0032-3861(95)93111-X10.1016/0032-3861(95)93111-X ↗
15. Tao J. · Plast. Rubber Compos. Process. Appl. (UK) · 1991 · 16 · 49
16. 10.1002/1097-4628(20001017)78:3<576::AID-APP120>3.0.CO;2-M10.1002/1097-4628(20001017)78:3<576::AID-APP120>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
17. 10.1002/app.1101110.1002/app.11011 ↗
18. Reinsch V.E. · Annu. Tech. Conf. ANTEC Conf. Proc. · 1991 · 37 · 2075
19. 10.1002/pc.2064710.1002/pc.20647 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.03.00710.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.03.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tca.2009.12.00310.1016/j.tca.2009.12.003 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tca.2013.06.02510.1016/j.tca.2013.06.025 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.02810.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.028 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.175063110.1063/1.1750631 ↗
25. 10.1016/0032-3861(78)90060-510.1016/0032-3861(78)90060-5 ↗
26. 10.1002/pen.1170010.1002/pen.11700 ↗
27. 10.1023/A:102396802668410.1023/A:1023968026684 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.1022610.1002/pc.10226 ↗