journal article·2020-05

PCL‐CNT nanocomposites prepared by melt compounding and evaluation of their basic properties

Sergey M. Lebedev

Polymer Composites· Volume 41· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Poly(ε‐caprolactone)‐based carbon nanotube composites (PCL‐CNT) fabricated by melt compounding were developed in this work. Complex analysis of main properties of PCL and PCL‐CNT composites was carried out in this study by means of different experimental methods such as dielectric spectroscopy in frequency domain, X‐ray diffraction, DSC analysis, scanning electron and optical microscopy, FTIR analysis, and rheological analysis. It has been found that the percolating threshold for studied composites is observed at 0.1 wt% CNT. The developed PCL‐CNT composites are suitable for processing by extrusion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University Tomsk Russia

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pi.90310.1002/pi.903 ↗
2. 10.1080/1060132960801088010.1080/10601329608010880 ↗
3. 10.1021/ma061605410.1021/ma0616054 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.01.01110.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.01.011 ↗
5. Gonçalves E. M. · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B · 2015 · 104 · 121010.1002/jbm.b.33432 ↗
6. 10.1002/mabi.20160025010.1002/mabi.201600250 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-3-642-45229-1_4110.1007/978-3-642-45229-1_41 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.849352910.1126/science.8493529 ↗
9. 10.1007/s40204-014-0026-710.1007/s40204-014-0026-7 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.033 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.01410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.014 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.05.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.05.002 ↗
13. Murariu M. · Polym. Sci. · 2015 · 132
14. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.12.01910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.12.019 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.2779610.1002/app.27796 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00956-410.1016/S0009-2614(03)00956-4 ↗
17. S.S.Crump Fast precise safe prototype with FDM In: Proc. ASME annual winter conference December 1991 Atlanta 5053 (1991).
18. 10.1007/s00170-012-4558-510.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
20. 10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<203::AID-JBM1007>3.0.CO;2-710.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<203::AID-JBM1007>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
21. 10.1002/jbm.b.1003710.1002/jbm.b.10037 ↗
22. Li X. · Int. J. Polym. Sci. · 2014 · 829145
23. 10.1016/j.procir.2013.01.03110.1016/j.procir.2013.01.031 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.03.02710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.03.027 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.bone.2008.04.01310.1016/j.bone.2008.04.013 ↗
26. 10.1126/science.137.3535.106310.1126/science.137.3535.1063 ↗
27. 10.1038/204652a010.1038/204652a0 ↗
28. 10.1002/jbm.1001510.1002/jbm.10015 ↗
29. 10.1107/S160057671402246810.1107/S1600576714022468 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.02.01910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.02.019 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.elstat.2009.11.00710.1016/j.elstat.2009.11.007 ↗
32. 10.4150/KPMI.2011.18.2.18110.4150/KPMI.2011.18.2.181 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym908032210.3390/polym9080322 ↗
34. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.4310.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.43 ↗
35. 10.1002/pol.1979.18017050910.1002/pol.1979.180170509 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.03.00210.1016/j.jdent.2006.03.002 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.07.03210.1016/j.matlet.2006.07.032 ↗
38. Zakaria Z. · Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2013
39. 10.1002/pen.2097110.1002/pen.20971 ↗
40. 10.1007/s00170-018-1953-610.1007/s00170-018-1953-6 ↗
41. 10.1002/polb.2107010.1002/polb.21070 ↗
42. 10.1016/S1872-5805(14)60146-310.1016/S1872-5805(14)60146-3 ↗