journal article·2017-09

Preparation and characterization of fibrous sepiolite modified silane coupling agent/fluororubber nanocomposite

Puxuan Yan, Yufeng Wang, Mengyi Wang, Jiangrong Lu, Feixue Han

Polymer Composites· Volume 38· Issue S1
Publisher page

Abstract

Fibrous sepiolite(Sep)/fluororubber (FKM) composite was prepared by co‐mixing and heat molding. Fibrous aggregation of acid sepiolite(aSep) was prepared by acid exfoliation of mineral sepiolite, and then organic sepiolite(oSep) was prepared by coupling agent modification of aSep. The crystal structure, chemical composition and morphology of different aggregations were mensurated using X‐ray diffraction, infrared spectrometer, and scanning electron microscope. The curing histories and mechanical properties of composites were analyzed for two kinds of fibrous sepiolites. The results indicated that apparent diameters of aSep and oSep were respectively 100–200 nm and 60–100 nm. The apparent crosslinking densities, curing velocities, and tensile strengths of FKM composites were increased by the addition of sepiolite, the curing velocities of oSep/FKM were lower than those of aSep/FKM, and the tensile strengths of oSep/FKM were upper than those of aSep/FKM. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:E208–E213, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Material Science and Engineering Guilin University of Electronic Technology Guilin 541004 China

Funding

Guangxi Natural Science Foundation

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Xu D. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2009 · 112 · 3
2. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.01.14910.1016/j.matlet.2014.01.149 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.07.01710.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.07.017 ↗
4. Feyzullahoğlu E. · Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. J J. Eng. Tribol. · 2015 · 229 · 1
5. 10.1016/j.wear.2015.02.01610.1016/j.wear.2015.02.016 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11434-013-0026-310.1007/s11434-013-0026-3 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.02910.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.029 ↗
8. 10.1177/095400831350796110.1177/0954008313507961 ↗
9. 10.1177/095400830604090010.1177/0954008306040900 ↗
10. Zhang R.C. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2014 · 131 · 16
11. 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.01610.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.016 ↗
12. Wang J.C. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2013 · 129 · 4
13. 10.1002/pc.2262710.1002/pc.22627 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2262710.1002/pc.22627 ↗
15. Lakshminarayanan S. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2012 · 124 · 610.1002/app.35624 ↗
16. 10.1021/la104410r10.1021/la104410r ↗
17. 10.1007/s10853-006-0432-x10.1007/s10853-006-0432-x ↗
18. Suarez M. · Appl. Clay Sci. · 2012
19. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.04.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2007.04.020 ↗
20. Zhang F.Q. · Polym. Bull. · 2005 · 55 · 6
21. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.10.02210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.10.022 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.02.05010.1016/j.ceramint.2012.02.050 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.05.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2010.05.020 ↗