Mixed matrix membranes of Pebax1657 loaded with iron benzene‐1,3,5‐tricarboxylate for gas separation
Source abstract
Abstract
Mixed matrix membranes offer major advantages in gas separation processes due to desirable properties found in both organic and inorganic membranes. In this study, a novel mixed matrix membrane was prepared for such application by incorporating iron benzene‐1,3,5‐tricarboxylate (Fe‐BTC) into the poly(amide‐6‐b‐ethylene oxide) (Pebax1657) polymer. Membranes with various loadings of 5, 10, and 20 wt% Fe‐BTC in the polymer matrix were fabricated to investigate the effect of filler loading on the membrane performance. Membranes, prepared by solution‐casting were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, Fourier transform infrared, X‐ray diffraction, and tensile test. Pure gas separation of CO2, CH4, and N2 and ideal gas selectivity of CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 were performed and permeation tests were carried out under 4, 8, and 12 bar pressures. Results show that adding Fe‐BTC into the Pebax1657 matrix improved both permeability and selectivity of the filled membranes. For instance, 10 wt% loading of Fe‐BTC into the Pebax1657 matrix led to CO2 permeability increase of 49% as well as CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 selectivities enhancements of about 36% and 16%, respectively. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:1363–1370, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation and Gas Transport · Muon and positron interactions and applications · Membrane Separation Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering University of Kashan Kashan Iran
Chemical Polymeric and Petrochemical Technology Development Research Division Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI) Tehran Iran
Funding
University of Kashan
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ie801903210.1021/ie8019032 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.07.04210.1016/j.seppur.2011.07.042 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.05910.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.059 ↗
4. Çakal Ü. · 2009
5. 10.1016/j.cherd.2012.06.00510.1016/j.cherd.2012.06.005 ↗
6. 10.12777/ijwr.2.1.2012.22-2410.12777/ijwr.2.1.2012.22-24 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.04.02510.1016/j.seppur.2013.04.025 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.00310.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.00610.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.006 ↗
10. 10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-J10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-J ↗
11. 10.1146/annurev.ms.22.080192.00040310.1146/annurev.ms.22.080192.000403 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00444-610.1016/S0376-7388(01)00444-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.04810.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.048 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.04.04910.1016/j.memsci.2009.04.049 ↗
15. 10.1021/ie901649510.1021/ie9016495 ↗
16. 10.1039/c1ee01324f10.1039/c1ee01324f ↗
17. 10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.39010.1016/j.desal.2006.03.390 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.10.04810.1016/j.micromeso.2010.10.048 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.12.00610.1016/j.memsci.2008.12.006 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.00910.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.009 ↗
21. 10.1039/B704325B10.1039/B704325B ↗
22. 10.1002/anie.20100123010.1002/anie.201001230 ↗
23. 10.1021/ja302787x10.1021/ja302787x ↗
24. Mulder M. · 1997
25. 10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00514-210.1016/S0376-7388(01)00514-2 ↗
26. 10.1002/pen.2334810.1002/pen.23348 ↗
27. 10.1021/ma051218e10.1021/ma051218e ↗
28. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2004.07.04510.1016/j.molstruc.2004.07.045 ↗
29. 10.1002/1099-0488(20000801)38:15<2051::AID-POLB100>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/1099-0488(20000801)38:15<2051::AID-POLB100>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
30. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.01.00510.1016/j.memsci.2008.01.005 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.00510.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.005 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.02410.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.024 ↗