journal article·2019-06

Dynamic mechanical characterization of boron nitride nanotube—epoxy nanocomposites

Meysam Rahmat, Alex Naftel, Behnam Ashrafi, Michael B. Jakubinek, Yadienka Martinez‐Rubi, Benoit Simard

Polymer Composites· Volume 40· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Quasi‐static and dynamic performances of an epoxy adhesive with and without Boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs) are studied here. This article investigates the thin film shear and bulk tensile properties of EPON 828/Epikure 3223. In addition to the neat epoxy material, specimens with 1 and 2 wt% concentrations of BNNTs were also tested. Double‐lap shear tests were performed at strain rates ranging from 4.0 × 10−4 to 3.7 × 103 s−1 and it was found that neither the incorporation of BNNTs nor increasing the strain rate had a substantial effect on the shear properties of the thin adhesive layer. However, bulk tensile properties were seen to be sensitive to changes in strain rate. An increase in the strain rate from 5.5 × 10−4 to 1.2 × 102 s−1 increased the tensile strength and Young's modulus by 39 and 113%, respectively; while the failure strain decreased by 49%. Additionally, the BNNT‐modified tensile specimens demonstrated up to 7% increase in tensile strength, up to a 16% increase in modulus, and a 9% decrease in the strain at failure. These results along with electron micrographs showed that due to pull‐out and bridging mechanisms of the nano‐reinforcements, the BNNTs are more effective in normal stress dominant applications, as opposed to shear stress. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:2119–2131, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Aerospace National Research Council Canada 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa Ontario K1A 0R6 Canada

Aerospace National Research Council Canada 5145 Decelles Ave., Montreal QC H3T 2B2 Canada

Division of Emerging Technologies National Research Council Canada 100 Sussex Drive, Ottawa Ontario K1A 0R6 Canada

Funding

National Research Council Canada

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00203-710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00203-7 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.02.05810.1016/j.polymer.2007.02.058 ↗
3. 10.1098/rsta.1914.001010.1098/rsta.1914.0010 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.09.01010.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.09.010 ↗
5. 10.1007/s12239-009-0023-310.1007/s12239-009-0023-3 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11340-010-9443-210.1007/s11340-010-9443-2 ↗
7. Pan W.andR.Schmidt “Strain Rate Effect In Material Testing of Bulk Adhesive” inStructures Under Shock and Impact IX N. Jones Editor.2006. p. 107–116.10.2495/SU060111 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.05.02810.1016/j.msea.2007.05.028 ↗
9. 10.1016/1359-835X(96)00075-910.1016/1359-835X(96)00075-9 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.07.02210.1016/j.matlet.2004.07.022 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.044 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.014 ↗
14. 10.1007/1-4020-4972-2_25110.1007/1-4020-4972-2_251 ↗
15. 10.1520/JTE10234J10.1520/JTE10234J ↗
16. Rotem A.andJ.M.Lifshitz. “Longitudinal strength of unidirectional fibrous composite under high rate of loading” in26th Annual Tech. Conf. Soc. Plastics Industry Reinforced Plastics/Composites Division. Washington DC (1971).
17. 10.1007/BF0054207810.1007/BF00542078 ↗
18. Kawata K. et al. “Dynamic behaviour analyses of composite materials” inJapan‐US Conference on Composite Materials.1981. Tokyo.
19. 10.1007/978-94-015-7764-910.1007/978-94-015-7764-9 ↗
20. EssersiO. M.Tarfaoui S.W.Boyd F.Meraghni andR.A.Shenoi “Dynamic study of adhesively bonded double lap composite joints” inICCM‐17 International Conferences on Composite Materials. Edinburgh United Kingdom (2009).
21. 10.1038/ncomms216610.1038/ncomms2166 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.125854410.1126/science.1258544 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.00310.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.003 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.03.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.03.002 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2328110.1002/pc.23281 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.12.05410.1016/j.polymer.2015.12.054 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.01110.1016/j.msea.2007.02.011 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.12.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.12.005 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.018 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.476975010.1063/1.4769750 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.09.00310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.09.003 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.002 ↗
33. 10.1080/19475411.2013.87093810.1080/19475411.2013.870938 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.01.01110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.01.011 ↗
35. 10.1039/C4TC01998A10.1039/C4TC01998A ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.03.00810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.03.008 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.09.02310.1016/j.actaastro.2017.09.023 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10853-015-9665-x10.1007/s10853-015-9665-x ↗
39. M.Rahmat Mechanics of Time‐Dependent Materials In Press (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-018-9393-0.10.1007/s11043-018-9393-0 ↗
40. Hexion.Technical Data Sheet Epon Resin 828. [Data Sheet]2005[cited 2018; 1–8]. Available from:http://www.hexion.com/en-US/product/epon-resin-828.
41. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.11.00910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.11.009 ↗
42. 10.1021/nn501661p10.1021/nn501661p ↗
43. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06987.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06987.x ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.07.01010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.07.010 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.10.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.10.004 ↗
46. ASTM D638‐14 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics ASTM International West Conshohocken PA (2014).
47. BruceD.M. D.K. Matlock J.G. Speer and A.K. De. “Assessment of the strain‐rate dependent tensile properties of automotive sheet steels” in2004 SAE World Congress. Detroit MI (2004).10.4271/2004-01-0507 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.06110.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.061 ↗