Failure mechanisms of 2‐D and 3‐D woven fiber reinforced polymer composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A simple lab‐scale weaving method was used to produce multidirectional fiber preforms to improve the delamination resistance and damage tolerance of composites. Mechanical properties measured in this study included short‐beam shear strength and damage tolerance of 2‐D and 3‐D woven composites. The constituents of fiber and matrix in these composites are Kevlar‐29 (Du Pont) and Epon 828 (Shell Chemical Co.) epoxy. Attention was directed to the differentiation of deformation and failure mechanisms in these composites as a function of material parameters and loading conditions. The sequence of failure mechanisms differ between 2‐D and 3‐D composites. Results indicated that 3‐D woven composites exhibited higher shear strength than 2‐D woven composites. Also, 3‐D composites absorbed more impact energy than 2‐D composites. Failure mechanisms of composites subjected to repeated impacts were observed intermittently by using scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy. The failure of 2‐D composites was due to a combination of shear and tensile mode, but in 3‐D composites the failure was dominated by tensile mode.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. K.Ko SAMPE J. July/August1986 p.26.
2. Li W. · SAMPE Quart. · 1988 · 19 · 4
3. Chou T. W. · 1989
4. Kelly A. · 1983
5. Tarnopol'skii M. Yu. · 1992
6. P. A.LagaceandD. B.Weems inTest Methods for Design Allowables for Fibrous Composites ASTMSTP 1003 C. C.Chamis ed. ASTM Press Philadelphia(1989).
7. Herrick J. W. · 1984
8. 10.1177/00219983710050010410.1177/002199837100500104 ↗
9. L. E.McAllisterandA. R.Taverna J. American Ceramic Soc. 73rd Ann. Meeting Chicago (1971).
10. McAllister L. E. · 1976
11. L. E.McAllisterandA. R.Taverna 10th Biennial Conf. on Carbon Paper No. FC‐40 Bethlehem Pa. (1971).
12. 10.1007/BF0068841410.1007/BF00688414 ↗
13. M. T.Cholakara B. Z.Jang andC. Z.Wang 34th Intl. SAMPE Symp. 2153(1989).
14. B. P.Jang MS thesis Materials Engineering Program Auburn University (1990).
15. 10.1520/CTR10268J10.1520/CTR10268J ↗
16. 10.1016/0921-5093(89)90355-910.1016/0921-5093(89)90355-9 ↗
17. C. F.Griffin in “Damage Tolerance of Toughness Resin Graphite Composites ”ASTMSTP 937 23 Philadelphia(1937).10.1520/STP24369S ↗
18. M. M.Sohi H. T.Hahn andJ. G.Willams in “The Effects of Resin Toughness and Modulus on Compressive Failure Modes of Quasi‐Isotropic Graphite/Epoxy Laminates ”ASTMSTP 937 37 Philadelphia(1987).10.1520/STP24370S ↗
19. K. R.Hirschbuehler “A Comparison of Several Mechanical Tests Used to Evaluate the Toughness of Composites ”ASTMSTP 937 61 Philadelphia(1987).10.1520/STP24371S ↗
20. B. A.Adams in “Impact Fatigue of Polymers Using an Instrumented Drop Tower Device ”ASTMSTP 936 281 Philadelphia(1987).10.1520/STP19385S ↗
21. J. W.HerrickandR.Globus “Impact Resistant Multidimensional Composites ”12th Natl. SAMPE Tech. Conf. 7(October1980).