Mechanical performance of thermoplastic composites using bituminous coal as filler: Study of a potentially sustainable end‐use application for Appalachian coal
Source abstract
Abstract
This study evaluated the utilization of bituminous coal from the Appalachian basin as filler material in high density polyethylene (HDPE) composites. Three coal types including Pittsburgh No. 8, Kittanning, and Upper Freeport were evaluated. The impact of coal (0–60 wt%) and coupling agent (0–3 wt%) content on flexure and tensile properties of the coal/HDPE composites was investigated. In addition, coal surface chemistry was analyzed using Boehm analyses and compared to pine wood flour. Composite flexure strength was maximum at 30 wt% coal, while tensile strength decreased with coal content. Addition of coupling agent to the composite had little to negative impact on mechanical properties. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:591–599, 2019. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, 251 Stocker Center Ohio University Athens Ohio 45701
Institute for Sustainable Energy and the Environment, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Ohio University, 350 W. State Street Athens Ohio 45701
Center for Advanced Materials Processing, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 049 Stocker Center Ohio University Athens Ohio 45701
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Zion Market Research · 2017
2. 10.3103/S1068364X1212006X10.3103/S1068364X1212006X ↗
3. 10.1002/app.2477210.1002/app.24772 ↗
4. 10.4236/jmmce.2010.9301610.4236/jmmce.2010.93016 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.01410.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.014 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.03.14810.1016/j.matlet.2017.03.148 ↗
7. Rojek M. · J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. · 2011 · 46 · 25
8. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.05010.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.050 ↗
9. 10.3133/sir2007501310.3133/sir20075013 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.04410.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.044 ↗
11. 10.1080/00914037.2011.61733810.1080/00914037.2011.617338 ↗
12. Kajaks J. · Mater. Sci. · 2015 · 21
13. U.S. EIA · 2016
14. 10.1088/1757-899X/111/1/01200310.1088/1757-899X/111/1/012003 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.002 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0058011010.1007/BF00580110 ↗
17. 10.1002/pc.2096210.1002/pc.20962 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.002 ↗
19. 10.1002/app.2933610.1002/app.29336 ↗
20. 10.1088/0370-1301/69/8/30510.1088/0370-1301/69/8/305 ↗
21. 10.1002/app.1018910.1002/app.10189 ↗
22. 10.1177/073168441036753510.1177/0731684410367535 ↗
23. 10.1021/ef901506910.1021/ef9015069 ↗
24. 10.1021/ef00010a00610.1021/ef00010a006 ↗