Effect of mechanical treatment on morphology and thermal and mechanical properties of sugar cane bagasse–low‐density polyethylene composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Sugar cane bagasse (SB)–low density polyethylene composites with different mechanically treated SB were prepared by a melt compounding method. The effect of the different treatments using supermasscolloider at low content of SB on the morphology, mechanical properties, and thermal behavior was investigated. Scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy indicated that the dispersion, crystallinity, and bonding of SB fibers depend on number of the treatments. The high modulus of SB generally improved tensile modulus of low‐density polyethylene linearly and is proportional to supermasscolloider treatments. All composites show that the elongation at break was fairly constant within experimental error. Thermal stability decreased in the presence of SB and linearly increased in respect to the treatment times. The melting temperature decreased at lower passes. However, at higher passes, there was a marginal change. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:1497–1503, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CSIR Materials Science and Manufacturing, Polymers and Composites Competence Area Nonwovens and Composites Research Group Summerstrand Port Elizabeth 6000 South Africa
Department of Chemistry University of the Free State (Qwaqwa Campus) Phuthaditjhaba 9866 South Africa
Department of Physics University of the Free State (Qwaqwa Campus) Phuthaditjhaba 9866 South Africa
Funding
Green Fund (DBSA, DEA, CSIR)
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1590/S0104-6632200400020001510.1590/S0104-66322004000200015 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2115010.1002/pc.21150 ↗
3. Motaung T.E. · Polym. Compos
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.006 ↗
5. 10.1023/A:101395452779110.1023/A:1013954527791 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.01.01410.1016/j.indcrop.2011.01.014 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.09.00310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.09.003 ↗
8. 10.1002/app.1046010.1002/app.10460 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.01010.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.010 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.11.09710.1016/j.matlet.2007.11.097 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.04010.1016/j.compositesb.2013.04.040 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.001 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.33910.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.339 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.12.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2012.12.013 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.00910.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/0014-3057(91)90090-B10.1016/0014-3057(91)90090-B ↗
17. 10.1007/s10570-013-9867-910.1007/s10570-013-9867-9 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10570-012-9745-x10.1007/s10570-012-9745-x ↗
19. 10.1016/S0014-3057(02)00048-410.1016/S0014-3057(02)00048-4 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2288710.1002/pc.22887 ↗
21. 10.5185/amlett.2012.1248210.5185/amlett.2012.12482 ↗
22. 10.1186/1754-6834-3-1010.1186/1754-6834-3-10 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.06510.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.065 ↗
24. Khan J.A. · Mater. Sci. Appl · 2010 · 1 · 350