Influence of fiber content on rheological and mechanical properties of pineapple leaf fibers‐polypropylene composites prepared by twin‐screw extrusion
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Pineapple leaf fiber (PALF) is an agricultural waste that could be used as a reinforcing fiber for thermoplastic polymers. Therefore, it is important to characterize the properties of these composites. In this paper, PALF was used to prepare polypropylene‐based composites by twin‐screw extrusion. The objective was to evaluate the influence of the fiber content (between 10 and 30 wt%) on the rheological and mechanical properties of the composites. Variations in fiber dimensions (length, diameter, aspect ratio) along the screws were analyzed and revealed limited degradation in the tested condition. The rheological behavior of the composites was directly impacted by the fiber content, with a regular increase of the viscosity and the development of a melt yield stress above 20 wt% PALF. The mechanical properties showed an increase in Young's modulus (+115% at 30 wt% PALF) and stress at break (+72% at 30 wt% PALF), proportional to the fiber content, but a sharp decrease in elongation at break (from 980% to 10% at 30 wt% PALF). These results confirm that the fiber content is the main parameter controlling the rheological and mechanical properties of the PALF/PP composites and that this fiber from agricultural waste can be considered as a good candidate for various applications of PP‐based composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
UMR FARE (Fractionnement des AgroRessources et Environnement) Université de Reims Champagne‐Ardenne Reims France
Department of Chemistry and Center of Sustainable Energy and Green Materials, Faculty of Science Mahidol University Nakhon Pathom Thailand
MINES ParisTech PSL Research University, CEMEF Sophia Antipolis Cedex France
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Thomas S. · 2009
2. Thomas S. · 2013
3. 10.1007/978-3-319-64641-110.1007/978-3-319-64641-1 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-410.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4 ↗
5. 10.1002/pen.2132810.1002/pen.21328 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2122410.1002/pc.21224 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
8. 10.1590/0104-1428.172210.1590/0104-1428.1722 ↗
9. Srinavas K. · Intern. J. Perform. Eng. · 2017 · 13 · 189
10. Mohamed A. R. · J. Food Agr. Envir. · 2009 · 7 · 235
11. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.00110.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.001 ↗
12. 10.1201/978020350820610.1201/9780203508206 ↗
13. Razak S. I. A. · BioRes. · 2015 · 10 · 4350
14. 10.1007/s12221-014-1107-x10.1007/s12221-014-1107-x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.018 ↗
16. 10.1002/mame.20170014310.1002/mame.201700143 ↗
17. 10.1002/mame.20180003710.1002/mame.201800037 ↗
18. 10.1002/mame.20040013210.1002/mame.200400132 ↗
19. 10.1155/2015/95056710.1155/2015/950567 ↗
20. Sapuan S. M. · 2011
21. Yogesh M. · Intern. J. Sci. Res. · 2017 · 6 · 799
22. Bhattacharyya J. C. T. B. · Plast. Rubber Proc. Appl. · 1986 · 6 · 119
23. 10.1002/app.2458410.1002/app.24584 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.05.00410.1016/j.polymertesting.2015.05.004 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.02610.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.026 ↗
26. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970531)64:9<1739::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-T10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970531)64:9<1739::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
27. 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00166-110.1016/S0921-5093(02)00166-1 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.2849610.1002/app.28496 ↗
29. M. M.Hossain A.H.M. F.Elahi S.Afrin M.A.Khan M.A.Jalil andM.D.Hossain 11th. International Conference on Mechanical Engineering Dhaka Bangladesh (2015).
30. 10.1002/app.1995.07057070810.1002/app.1995.070570708 ↗
31. 10.1002/app.2715610.1002/app.27156 ↗
32. 10.1002/app.3025210.1002/app.30252 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.008 ↗
34. 10.1002/app.3291010.1002/app.32910 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.00510.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.005 ↗
36. Muminari D. R. · Intern. J. Chem. Mol. Eng. · 2015 · 9 · 10002547
37. Leao A. L. · Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. · 2010 · 522 · 36
38. 10.1023/A:100465950723110.1023/A:1004659507231 ↗
39. 10.1002/pc.1036310.1002/pc.10363 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.02710.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.027 ↗
41. 10.1007/s12221-014-1469-010.1007/s12221-014-1469-0 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.04.01210.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.04.012 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.00910.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.009 ↗
44. Jaramillo N. · Ingen. Compet. · 2016 · 18 · 151
45. 10.1155/2018/738436010.1155/2018/7384360 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.02.03710.1016/j.indcrop.2012.02.037 ↗
47. Siregar J. P. · J. Food Agr. Env. · 2010 · 8 · 1103
48. 10.1002/pc.2447510.1002/pc.24475 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10570-014-0375-310.1007/s10570-014-0375-3 ↗
50. 10.1002/pen.2352110.1002/pen.23521 ↗
51. 10.1002/app.2266110.1002/app.22661 ↗
52. 10.1122/1.493822410.1122/1.4938224 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00386-210.1016/S0032-3861(96)00386-2 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.33610.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.336 ↗
55. 10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60315-310.1016/S1672-6529(16)60315-3 ↗
56. 10.1163/156855498X0015310.1163/156855498X00153 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.07.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2016.07.020 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.009 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.011 ↗
60. 10.1002/pen.1034810.1002/pen.10348 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.12.03510.1016/j.polymer.2007.12.035 ↗
62. 10.1002/cjce.545068050310.1002/cjce.5450680503 ↗
63. 10.1122/1.54884810.1122/1.548848 ↗
64. 10.1007/s00397-003-0349-010.1007/s00397-003-0349-0 ↗
65. 10.1002/pc.2291210.1002/pc.22912 ↗
66. 10.1088/1757-899X/196/1/01203110.1088/1757-899X/196/1/012031 ↗