journal article·2013-06

Molding of PBO fabric reinforced thermoplastic composite to achieve high fiber volume fraction

Anchang Xu, Limin Bao, Mitsuo Nishida, Atsuhiko Yamanaka

Polymer Composites· Volume 34· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

In fiber‐reinforced plastic materials, the fiber volume fraction is one of the most important parameters, and it strongly influences the composite properties. However, it is hard to improve impregnation and the fiber volume fraction in fiber‐reinforced thermoplastics because thermoplastic resins have high melt viscosities. This study explored a reformative solution impregnation method for molding fabric‐reinforced thermoplastic composites with a high fiber volume fraction. The fiber volume fraction was significantly increased, to 60%, which is equal to that of fiber‐reinforced thermosetting plastic materials. A comparison indicated that a fiber‐reinforced thermoplastic and a fiber‐reinforced thermosetting plastic with the same reinforcing fiber had similar tensile properties and that the proposed molding method is effective in thermoplastic composite manufacture. POLYM. COMPOS., 34:953–958, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Bioscience and Textile Technology Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Science and Technology Shinshu University 3‐15‐1 Tokida, Ueda Nagano 386‐8567 Japan

Faculty of Textile Science and Technology Shinshu University 3‐15‐1 Tokida Ueda Nagano 386‐8567 Japan

Research Center Toyobo Co., Ltd. 2‐1‐1 Katata Otsu, Shiga 520‐0292 Japan

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00006-210.1016/S1359-835X(98)00006-2 ↗
2. 10.1177/08927057980110010210.1177/089270579801100102 ↗
3. Chang I.Y. · J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. · 1 · 1988
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.03610.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.036 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.05.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2004.05.014 ↗
6. 10.1016/0956-7143(92)90110-G10.1016/0956-7143(92)90110-G ↗
7. Nakamura K. · J. Jpn. Soc. Compos. Mater · 2011 · 37
8. Ward M.V. · US Patent · 1988 · 4722980
9. 10.1177/08927057900030010410.1177/089270579000300104 ↗
10. Cogswell F.N. · US Patent · 1985 · 4541884
11. 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.00710.1016/j.dental.2010.11.007 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0014-3057(02)00049-610.1016/S0014-3057(02)00049-6 ↗
13. 10.1002/mame.20030001310.1002/mame.200300013 ↗
14. 10.1016/0032-3861(92)90566-F10.1016/0032-3861(92)90566-F ↗
15. Yu L. · J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. · 2011 · 1
16. 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00419-310.1016/S0021-9797(03)00419-3 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.09.05010.1016/j.apsusc.2009.09.050 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2009.01.08010.1016/j.vacuum.2009.01.080 ↗
19. Goldman M. · Pure Appl. Chem · 1985 · 57