Essential work of fracture analysis for surface modified carbon fiber/polypropylene composites with different interfacial adhesion
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The fracture behavior of polypropylene/carbon fiber composites with different interfacial adhesion was evaluated using the essential work of fracture method. All samples exhibited ductile fracture characteristics, while the specific essential fracture work, we, was obviously decreased by carbon fiber incorporation, indicating the impaired ductility and toughness for polypropylene. The cracks were easily formed and expanded at the fiber‐matrix interface under external force for polypropylene/original carbon fiber composites, since the weak interfacial adhesion between the fiber and matrix could not prevent the generation of new crack. Introduction of compatibilizer as well as surface modification of fibers effectively improved the interfacial adhesion between the fiber and matrix, so that the value of we increased and the elastic deformation of the composites became more prominent. Therefore, the improvement of interfacial adhesion between the fiber and matrix influenced both elastic and plastic deformation of the composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Material and Mechanical Engineering Beijing Technology and Business University Beijing China
Key Laboratory of Polymer Processing Engineering Ministry of Education, South China University of Technology Guangzhou China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/15583724.2016.116954610.1080/15583724.2016.1169546 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.10.01810.1016/j.compositesa.2016.10.018 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.01.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2015.01.022 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.01.04010.1016/j.indcrop.2013.01.040 ↗
5. 10.1002/pat.385110.1002/pat.3851 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.017 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10853-007-2169-610.1007/s10853-007-2169-6 ↗
8. Tang Q. · J. Biore. Bio · 2019 · 4 · 51
9. Wang F. · J. Biore. Bio · 2019 · 4 · 60
10. 10.1002/pc.2436910.1002/pc.24369 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.05.01310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.05.013 ↗
12. 10.1002/app.3062910.1002/app.30629 ↗
13. Bassani A. · Polym. Sci. · 2010 · 88 · 1081
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.06210.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.062 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.01.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2017.01.021 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.03.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2006.03.005 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.08110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.081 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00029-910.1016/S0032-3861(98)00029-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.001 ↗
20. 10.1023/A:100434501710510.1023/A:1004345017105 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10973-016-5996-310.1007/s10973-016-5996-3 ↗
22. 10.1021/ma00074a00610.1021/ma00074a006 ↗
23. Broberg K. B. · Arkiv for Fysik · 1960 · 18 · 159
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.016 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.11.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.11.008 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.002 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.08.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2011.08.019 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.09.01010.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.09.010 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.06.00410.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.06.004 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0013-7944(99)00096-X10.1016/S0013-7944(99)00096-X ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.007 ↗
32. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.910.3144/expresspolymlett.2011.9 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.07.01710.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.07.017 ↗
34. 10.1080/09276440.2017.126751310.1080/09276440.2017.1267513 ↗
35. 10.1080/09243046.2013.84489110.1080/09243046.2013.844891 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10853-018-2753-y10.1007/s10853-018-2753-y ↗
37. 10.1177/002199831879739410.1177/0021998318797394 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.06.00610.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.06.006 ↗