Application of box‐behnken design and neural computation for tribo‐mechanical performance analysis of iron‐mud‐filled glass‐fiber/epoxy composite and parametric optimization using PSO
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the possible utilization of iron mine waste for developing a new class of hybrid polymer composites. The composites were fabricated using hand‐layup process by reinforcing woven glass fibers in the epoxy polymer filled with different weight proportions of iron‐mud. Abrasion wear experiments were conducted according to Box‐Behnken design approach under controlled laboratory conditions using a dry abrasion tester. It was found that hardness, tensile modulus, impact energy and abrasion resistance of the fabricated composites improved with filler addition. Also, a prediction tool based on artificial neural network was implemented to investigate the tribological properties of the composites and the results were compared with the experimental ones. A metaheuristic approach like particle swarm optimization was also used to reveal the minimum wear (in volume) at optimal parametric combination. The results showed increase in both wear (in volume) and specific wear rate with respect to increase in the loads as well as sliding velocity. It also exhibited an increase in the wear with decrease in the specific wear rate with respect to the abrading distance. Finally, the morphology of the abraded surfaces was examined by using scanning electron microscopy and the possible abrasion mechanisms were critically examined and presented. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:1433–1449, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering KIIT (Deemed to be University) Bhubaneswar Odisha 751024 India
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0261-3069(92)90241-910.1016/0261-3069(92)90241-9 ↗
2. 10.2355/isijinternational.53.147110.2355/isijinternational.53.1471 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0142-9418(02)00121-610.1016/S0142-9418(02)00121-6 ↗
4. Stachowiak G. · 2005
5. 10.1016/S0043-1648(97)00188-910.1016/S0043-1648(97)00188-9 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00398-710.1016/S0043-1648(00)00398-7 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00557-910.1016/S0043-1648(01)00557-9 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2057610.1002/pc.20576 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.triboint.2010.08.01010.1016/j.triboint.2010.08.010 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.08.01210.1016/j.wear.2006.08.012 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.01610.1016/j.msea.2006.09.016 ↗
12. 10.1002/app.3493610.1002/app.34936 ↗
13. Patnaik A. · Malaysian Polym. J. · 2010 · 5 · 37
14. 10.1016/0043-1648(90)90169-B10.1016/0043-1648(90)90169-B ↗
15. BRGM Management of Mining Quarrying and Ore‐Processing Waste in the European Union 79 RP‐50319‐FR (2001).
16. V.Kumar G.Jadhav D.Dutta andS.Manna International conference on Mineral Processing Technology (MPT 2003)(POSTER) Panjim Goa 6–8 February (2003).
17. A.Juwarkar S.Singh K.Dubay andM.Nimje In proceedings: National seminar on status of environmental management in mining industry BHU 197(2003).
18. Y.Mohan S.Asolekar in proceedings ofSWEMP 195(2004).
19. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.07.00710.1016/j.resconrec.2008.07.007 ↗
20. Pati P.R. · Polym. Compos. · 2017
21. 10.1007/s11029-017-9633-410.1007/s11029-017-9633-4 ↗
22. 10.1016/0043-1648(91)90139-L10.1016/0043-1648(91)90139-L ↗
23. 10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.01910.1016/j.wear.2012.12.019 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.11710.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.117 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.09.00910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.09.009 ↗
26. 10.1002/macp.20060005210.1002/macp.200600052 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.12810.1016/j.msea.2007.01.128 ↗
28. ASTM D2583‐13a ASTM Intertnational West Conshohocken PA (2013).
29. ASTM D792‐ · 2013
30. Agarwal B.D. · 1996
31. ASTM D2734‐16 ASTM InternationalWest Conshohocken PA (2016).
32. ASTM D 3039/D 3039M‐14 ASTM International West Conshohocken PA (2014).
33. ASTM D2344/D2344M ASTM InternationalWest Conshohocken PA (2016).
34. ASTM D256‐10e1 ASTM International West Conshohocken PA (2010).
35. ASTM G65‐16 ASTM International West Conshohocken PA (2016).
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.03110.1016/j.compositesb.2014.09.031 ↗
37. 10.9734/BBJ/2013/337910.9734/BBJ/2013/3379 ↗
38. Nayak R.K. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2016
39. Haykin S. · 1999
40. Rajasekaran S. · 2003
41. 10.1177/073168440708564410.1177/0731684407085644 ↗
42. 10.1080/1040200090349130910.1080/10402000903491309 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.01810.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.018 ↗
44. 10.1177/073168440809397510.1177/0731684408093975 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.05.01910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.05.019 ↗
46. 10.1002/app.1192710.1002/app.11927 ↗
47. 10.4236/jmmce.2010.9100310.4236/jmmce.2010.91003 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.00210.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.002 ↗
49. 10.1177/0734242X0935226010.1177/0734242X09352260 ↗
50. Montgomery D.C · 2013
51. 10.1002/047145850310.1002/0471458503 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.07.00910.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.07.009 ↗
53. Deo C. · Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. · 2010 · 17 · 219
54. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.03.01810.1016/j.msea.2008.03.018 ↗
55. 10.11648/j.am.20120101.1210.11648/j.am.20120101.12 ↗
56. B.SureshaandG.Chandramohan J Mater Process Tech 200 306(2008).10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.035 ↗
57. 10.1177/073168440707553310.1177/0731684407075533 ↗
58. 10.1177/002199831036958910.1177/0021998310369589 ↗
59. Agarwal G. · Int. J. Compos. Mater. · 2012 · 2 · 1148
60. 10.1177/002199830707873010.1177/0021998307078730 ↗
61. Ratner S. · Sov. Plast. · 1964 · 7 · 37
62. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.01010.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.010 ↗
63. J.Kennedy R.C.Eberhart andY.Shi Swarm intelligence Kaufmann Elsevier San Francisco 700(2001).
64. 10.1002/978047061216310.1002/9780470612163 ↗
65. Olsson A.E. · 2011
66. 10.1007/978-3-642-17390-510.1007/978-3-642-17390-5 ↗
67. R.C.EberhartandY.Shi Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation IEEE 84 (2000).