Prediction of the effective thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube‐reinforced polymer systems
Source abstract
Abstract
A study dealing with the effect of the carbon nanotubes (CNTs), at various weight fractions, on the effective thermal conductivity of a CNT‐reinforced polymer by associating it with the Kapitza resistance ( R Kap ) phenomena is presented. The finite element method was utilized as a tool for the models' solution by using the principles of the representative volume element. An intermediate continuum layer between polymer matrix and CNTs was considered for the representation of the R Kap phenomena. The influence of the intensity of R Kap phenomena at various CNT contents was investigated through the parametric study of the R Kap value and the thickness of the intermediate layer. The predicted results were compared against experimental measurements derived from an equivalent CNT–epoxy resin system. The discrepancy between calculated and measured values is diminished when the R Kap phenomena are taken into account, thus confirming the existence of thermal resistance between the CNTs and the polymer matrix. The R Kap rise as the % CNT weight content is increased. This behavior is correlated to the higher CNT agglomeration at higher CNT contents, which is proven by the scanning electron microscopy and thus providing a first indication of the effect of the CNT agglomeration on the effective thermal conductivity at various CNT contents. POLYM. COMPOS., 35:1997–2009, 2014. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics Applied Mechanics Laboratory, University of Patras GR‐26500 Patras Greece
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/382054a010.1038/382054a0 ↗
2. Yakobson B. · Top. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 80 · 10
3. 10.1063/1.180887410.1063/1.1808874 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00339020127710.1007/s003390201277 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.461310.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4613 ↗
6. Kim P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 21
7. 10.1016/0038-1098(96)00386-910.1016/0038-1098(96)00386-9 ↗
8. 10.1093/oso/9780195159424.001.000110.1093/oso/9780195159424.001.0001 ↗
9. Fourier J. · 1878
10. 10.1021/nl050714d10.1021/nl050714d ↗
11. Thomas A.J. · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 045413‐1
12. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.11.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.11.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00577-010.1016/S0032-3861(96)00577-0 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.273748410.1115/1.2737484 ↗
15. Xu Y. · Compos. Part A: Appl. Sci. Manufact. · 2006 · 37 · 1
16. Moisala A. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 66 · 10
17. 10.1063/1.173632810.1063/1.1736328 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.004 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.179437010.1063/1.1794370 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0379-6779(98)01070-410.1016/S0379-6779(98)01070-4 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.07542410.1103/PhysRevB.77.075424 ↗
22. Baughman R.H. · Mater. Sci. · 2000 · 290 · 1310
23. 10.1103/PhysRev.60.35410.1103/PhysRev.60.354 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.210339810.1063/1.2103398 ↗
25. 10.1002/polb.2080110.1002/polb.20801 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00956-410.1016/S0009-2614(03)00956-4 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.06210.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.062 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.36520910.1063/1.365209 ↗
29. Xue Q. · Nanotechnology · 2006 · 17 · 6
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.22430110.1103/PhysRevB.66.224301 ↗
31. 10.1038/nmat99610.1038/nmat996 ↗
32. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/15/15570210.1088/0957-4484/20/15/155702 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2006.11.00310.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2006.11.003 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.180887410.1063/1.1808874 ↗
35. Chen T. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 10
36. 10.1115/1.287126510.1115/1.2871265 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2098110.1002/pc.20981 ↗
38. E.Fiamegkou.“Predicting the effective thermal and electrical conductivity of carbon nanotubes reinforced polymers using the DIGIMAT capabilities” inProceedings of DIGIMAT User's Meeting 2011 The Material Modeling Conference Munich Germany (2011).
39. 10.1299/jsmea.47.18110.1299/jsmea.47.181 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cma.2004.06.03010.1016/j.cma.2004.06.030 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.cap.2005.01.05310.1016/j.cap.2005.01.053 ↗
42. Yang K. · Carbon · 2009 · 47 · 7
43. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.02910.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.029 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.diamond.2008.03.03710.1016/j.diamond.2008.03.037 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.02.03110.1016/j.carbon.2004.02.031 ↗
46. 10.1299/jtst.1.13810.1299/jtst.1.138 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.12540310.1103/PhysRevB.74.125403 ↗
48. 10.1201/9781439834398.ch2610.1201/9781439834398.ch26 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.R901510.1103/PhysRevB.59.R9015 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.12707910.1063/1.127079 ↗
51. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/24/24570510.1088/0957-4484/20/24/245705 ↗
52. 10.1021/ma801156910.1021/ma8011569 ↗