journal article·2019-12

Influence of the hybrid materials based on carbon nanotubes and tannic acid on the rheological, thermal and mechanical performances of nitrile butadiene rubber composites

Yuan Fan, Ur Ryong Cho

Polymer Composites· Volume 40· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this work, hybrid composites are consisting of single wall carbon nanotubes (CNT) and tannic acid (TA) embedded in nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) matrix using kneading followed by the hot‐pressing method. The CNT and TA were mixed to NBR at different ratio and the obtained composites were subjected to morphological, rheological and thermal analysis as well as mechanical properties. The tensile test results manifested that both CNT and TA can be used as the reinforcing fillers, while the NBR composites filled with CNT exhibited a stronger mechanical behavior, indicating CNT was shown to be the more effective in tensile strength. Furthermore, the organic‐inorganic hybrid fillers presented enhancement of mechanical properties as compared to the neat NBR.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Energy, Materials and Chemical Engineering Korea University of Technology and Education Chungnam Republic of Korea

Research Center of Eco‐friendly & High‐performance Chemical Materials Chungnam Republic of Korea

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.07710.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.077 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2016.07.019 ↗
3. 10.1039/C6TC05488A10.1039/C6TC05488A ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.07.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2017.07.014 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2019.01.021 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2018.03.021 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.02.02110.1016/j.polymer.2019.02.021 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.003 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2381710.1002/pc.23817 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2412610.1002/pc.24126 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.009 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.08.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.08.003 ↗
13. 10.1002/polb.2152910.1002/polb.21529 ↗
14. 10.1002/polb.1062710.1002/polb.10627 ↗
15. 10.1002/polb.2205410.1002/polb.22054 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2385210.1002/pc.23852 ↗
17. 10.1002/vnl.2163510.1002/vnl.21635 ↗
18. Li X. X. · Polymer · 2017 · 41 · 750
19. 10.1002/pc.2407210.1002/pc.24072 ↗
20. 10.1002/polb.2306010.1002/polb.23060 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00094-X10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00094-X ↗
22. 10.1039/C4TC01037J10.1039/C4TC01037J ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.020 ↗
24. 10.1002/polb.2452210.1002/polb.24522 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003 ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2258510.1002/pc.22585 ↗
27. 10.1177/009524431246216210.1177/0095244312462162 ↗
28. 10.1007/s13233-018-6058-310.1007/s13233-018-6058-3 ↗
29. Fan Y. · Carbon Lett. · 2018 · 27 · 72
30. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.04410.1016/j.cej.2016.06.044 ↗
31. 10.1002/admi.20150029810.1002/admi.201500298 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0005110.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00051 ↗
33. 10.1002/med.2142210.1002/med.21422 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.06210.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.062 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.06.02110.1016/j.polymer.2018.06.021 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.07.02010.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.07.020 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2017.10.002 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.010 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.03210.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.032 ↗
40. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100409-8.00003-610.1016/B978-0-08-100409-8.00003-6 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.12.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2012.12.004 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.clay.2018.03.00610.1016/j.clay.2018.03.006 ↗
43. Shao H. F. · Polym. Sci. · 2012 · 54 · 760