Bond performance of fiber reinforced polymer rebars in different casting positions
Source abstract
Abstract
In the last two decades, fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) rebars have become attractive to civil engineers, due to their corrosion resistance and high strength‐to‐weight ratio. To take advantage of such properties, many research studies have been carried out on the mechanical and physical properties of FRP rebars in concrete, and critical issues have been discovered regarding the bond behavior of FRP rebars. In this study, an effort was made to investigate the effects of FRP rebar types, locations and concrete casting positions on the bond performance of FRP rebars embedded in concrete members. Experimental investigations were conducted using a total of 63 specimens, with seven types of reinforcing bars, and three different casting positions. According to the test results, the bond performance of FRP reinforced concrete was greatly influenced by FRP type and surface condition; while vertical casting showed higher bond strength than horizontal casting. In addition, the bond strength reduction ratio of FRP rebars cast in the horizontal direction was smaller than that of steel bars. POLYM. COMPOS., 37:2098–2108, 2016. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Korea Institute of Construction Technology Goyang 411‐714 Republic of Korea
Department of Mega Structures Sungkyunkwan University Suwon 440‐746 Republic of Korea
Department of Civil Environmental, and Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida Orlando Florida 32816
Department of Civil and Environmental System Engineering Sungkyunkwan University Suwon 440‐746 Republic of Korea
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Sagüés A.A. · 1994
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:3(203)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:3(203) ↗
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:11(3344)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:11(3344) ↗
4. Gangarao H. · 1997 · 143
5. Nagasaka T. · ACI Special Publication · 1993 · 138
6. Malvar L.J. · ACI Mater. J. · 1995 · 92 · 3
7. Nanni A. · 1995 · 135
8. Benmokrane B. · ACI Mater. J. · 1996 · 93 · 3
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(247)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(247) ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(40)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(40) ↗
11. Z.Achillides Bond Behaviour of FRP Bars in Concrete University of Sheffield Department of Civil and Structural Engineering (1998).
12. Lee J.Y. · Compos. B · 2008 · 39 · 2
13. 10.1007/s11029-010-9117-210.1007/s11029-010-9117-2 ↗
14. Lee J.Y. · Mag. Concrete Res. · 2012 · 64
15. Lee J.Y. · Compos. B · 2012 · 43 · 2
16. ACI 318‐11 · 2011
17. Eurocode‐2 · 1991
18. Ehsani M. · ACI Special Publ. · 1993 · 138
19. Nakaba K. · ACI Struct. J. · 2001 · 98 · 3
20. CSA S806‐02 · 2002
21. ASTM C234‐91a · 1991
22. Eligehausen R. · 1983
23. Oh B.H. · J. Struct. Eng. · 2007 · 133 · 2