Anisotropic continuum damage model for prediction of failure in flax/polypropylene fabric composites
Source abstract
Abstract
An anisotropic continuum damage modeling approach was applied to model failure of a composite of unidirectional flax in a polypropylene matrix under quasi‐static tensile loading. Tensile, compressive and shear stiffness, and strength values of the composite were characterized according to ASTM standards, and the damage was quantified by optical microscopy. Based on the experimental strength and damage values, an anisotropic strain‐dependent material damage model was developed and implemented in the finite element program ABAQUS. This was combined with geometric models of the fabric composites incorporating the yarn geometry. Good agreement was observed between the experimental and numerical stress–strain curves, and the failure strength prediction by the model was within 3.1% of the experimental value. This study shows that combining a geometric model closely incorporating the actual geometry of a fabric composite with an experimentally determined material degradation model can yield good predictions of the mechanical behaviour of the composite. POLYM. COMPOS., 37:2588–2597, 2016. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Centre for Advanced Composite Materials University of Auckland New Zealand
Funding
NeSI's Collaborator Institutions and Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, New Zealand
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1115/1.251563910.1115/1.2515639 ↗
2. Soden P.D. · Comp. Sci. Technol. · 1998 · 58 · 7
3. 10.1177/07316844840030010210.1177/073168448400300102 ↗
4. 10.1115/1.301382210.1115/1.3013822 ↗
5. 10.1098/rspa.1985.005510.1098/rspa.1985.0055 ↗
6. Azzi V.D. · Exp. Mech. · 1965 · 5 · 9
7. 10.1177/002199830809391210.1177/0021998308093912 ↗
8. J.M.Gan Modelling the Initiation and Evolution of Damage Within GFRP by Including Real Geometric Variability ICCM18 Jeju Korea (2011).
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.017 ↗
10. Maimi P. · 2006
11. 10.1142/S175697370900014110.1142/S1756973709000141 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.023 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.02110.1016/j.matdes.2010.05.021 ↗
15. H.P.Vaidyanathan P.Murty andS.P.Eswara Hybrid Natural Fiber Composites Molded Auto‐Body Panels/Skins (Hybrid NFPC): Processing Characterization and Modeling SAE International Warrendale PA (2011).10.4271/2011-01-0219 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11837-006-0234-210.1007/s11837-006-0234-2 ↗
17. Singh and R. · 2005
18. 10.1177/00219983740080030310.1177/002199837400800303 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.08.00210.1016/j.matdes.2006.08.002 ↗
20. 10.1177/00219983790130020610.1177/002199837901300206 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.14910.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.149 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.05.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2011.05.015 ↗
23. Rabotnov Y.N. · Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. · 1963 · 178 · 2‐117
24. Kachanov L.M. · Isv. Akad. Nauk. SSR. Otd Tekh. Nauk · 1958 · 8 · 26
25. 10.1007/BF0035648610.1007/BF00356486 ↗
26. 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90029-910.1016/0022-5096(94)90029-9 ↗
27. Fish J. · Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. · 1999 · 45 · 11
28. 10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00056-510.1016/S0749-6419(00)00056-5 ↗
29. 10.1016/0020-7225(92)90059-P10.1016/0020-7225(92)90059-P ↗
30. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.09.00810.1016/j.commatsci.2010.09.008 ↗
31. 10.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-010.1016/0167-6636(94)00053-0 ↗
32. 10.1177/10567895950040040310.1177/105678959500400403 ↗
33. Sherburn M. · 2007
34. 10.1002/pen.76016051210.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
35. 10.1002/nme.27610.1002/nme.276 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00139-410.1016/S0045-7825(97)00139-4 ↗