Wear characteristics of glass‐polyester‐based hybrid composites: A parametric analysis using response surface method and fuzzy logic
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Marble dust generated during processing of the marble producing rocks is a major solid waste with a detrimental impact on environment. Analysis shows that this waste has constituents having compounds like SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, etc., in different proportions. This paper explores on the possible use of waste marble dust as secondary filler in glass‐polyester composites and reports on its dry sliding wear characteristics. Such hybrid composites with unsaturated polyester as the matrix are fabricated by keeping the woven glass fibre loading fixed and by varying the weight fraction of the particulate filler, that is, marble dust through a simple hand layup route. Dry sliding wear trials are conducted under different test conditions as per ASTM G 99‐05 following the L30 model of response surface method (RSM). A parametric appraisal of the wear process is made using RSM and the significant control factors and their interactions influencing the specific wear rates are identified. Scanning electron microscopy of the worn composite surfaces is done to ascertain the wear mechanism. It is found that the presence of marble dust improves the wear resistance of unfilled glass‐polyester composites substantially. Further, prediction of wear rate of the composites for a wide range of filler content and sliding velocities is conducted using RSM and another prediction model based on fuzzy logic and the outcomes are compared.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Brake Systems and Friction Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering Department National Institute of Technology Rourkela India
Materials Chemistry Department CSIR‐Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology Bhubaneswar India
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.04.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.04.002 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.04810.1016/j.jallcom.2019.07.048 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.04.06310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.04.063 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.09810.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.098 ↗
5. Yadav R. · Def. Technol · 2019 · 1
6. 10.1016/j.coco.2018.04.00910.1016/j.coco.2018.04.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.10079810.1016/j.jobe.2019.100798 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.05410.1016/j.msec.2018.12.054 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.06910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.069 ↗
10. 10.1177/073168441774774210.1177/0731684417747742 ↗
11. 10.1243/13506500276235533410.1243/135065002762355334 ↗
12. 10.4236/wjnse.2012.2100610.4236/wjnse.2012.21006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.triboint.2018.09.01010.1016/j.triboint.2018.09.010 ↗
14. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2019.1510.3144/expresspolymlett.2019.15 ↗
15. Begum K. · Res. J. Eng. Sci · 2013 · 2 · 2278
16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.04310.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.043 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11100710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111007 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.dt.2018.04.00410.1016/j.dt.2018.04.004 ↗
19. 10.1177/073168441453079010.1177/0731684414530790 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.00310.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.003 ↗
21. Hilles M. M. · Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J · 2019 · 22 · 920
22. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.04.02410.1016/j.jmrt.2018.04.024 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.coco.2018.03.00310.1016/j.coco.2018.03.003 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.043 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.02610.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.026 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.016 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.00610.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.006 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0043-1648(96)07327-910.1016/S0043-1648(96)07327-9 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10715610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107156 ↗
30. 10.1088/1757-899X/225/1/01209710.1088/1757-899X/225/1/012097 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jestch.2015.07.00810.1016/j.jestch.2015.07.008 ↗
32. 10.1080/03602559.2010.53160610.1080/03602559.2010.531606 ↗
33. Abdalrazaq I. · J. Eng. Dev · 2013 · 17 · 164
34. 10.1016/j.wear.2009.07.02110.1016/j.wear.2009.07.021 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.05710.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.057 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.01810.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.018 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.02110.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.021 ↗
38. 10.1080/1040200090349130910.1080/10402000903491309 ↗
39. 10.1177/073168440708658910.1177/0731684407086589 ↗
40. 10.1109/91.49390410.1109/91.493904 ↗
41. 10.1155/2013/58187910.1155/2013/581879 ↗
42. Gupta P. · Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci · 2017 · 8 · 66
43. GadA FarooqM. Application of fuzzy logic in engineering problems. In:IECON Proceedings (Industrial Electronics Conference). Vol 1.;2001:2044‐2049. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/iecon.2001.97560610.1109/IECON.2001.975606 ↗
44. 10.1109/30.33834910.1109/30.338349 ↗
45. 10.1007/s12046-017-0601-410.1007/s12046-017-0601-4 ↗
46. BalasubramanianK SultanMTH CardonaF RajeswariN. Machining analysis of natural fibre reinforced composites using fuzzy logic. In:IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol 152.;2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/152/1/01205110.1088/1757-899X/152/1/012051 ↗
47. Basavarajappa S. · J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng · 2009 · 8 · 379
48. 10.19026/rjaset.7.68110.19026/rjaset.7.681 ↗
49. SarkarP ModakN SahooP. Effect of Normal Load and Velocity on Continuous Sliding Friction and Wear Behavior of Woven Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composite. In:Materials Today: Proceedings.;2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.19110.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.191 ↗
50. ArivalaganP ChandramohanG KumarA PalaniappanN. Studies on dry sliding wear behaviour of hybrid composites.Proc Int Conf Front Automob Mech Eng ‐ 2010 FAME‐2010.2010;(February):46–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/FAME.2010.571479610.1109/FAME.2010.5714796 ↗
51. Nayak S. K. · Polym. Compos · 2019 · 2020 · 1