Piezoresistive characterization of epoxy based nanocomposites loaded with SWCNTs‐DWCNTs in tensile and fracture tests
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Strain sensing capability of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) doped epoxy under tensile and flexural tests were broadly studied, while the piezoresistive behavior of nanocomposites in precracked specimen, that is, in fracture toughness tests, have not been addressed deeply in the literature. Therefore, in the current paper, both the strain and crack sensing capabilities of single wall carbon nanotubes‐double wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs‐DWCNTs) doped epoxy subjected to tensile and mode I fracture tests were investigated. Different CNT loadings including 0.5 and 0.75 wt% were used to compare the effect of various states of CNTs dispersion, including uniformly dispersed CNTs and aggregates, on electromechanical properties. Results showed that specimens loaded at 0.5 wt% of CNTs possessed proper tensile strength, fracture toughness, piezoresistivity, and sensitivity. A nonlinear trend in normalized resistance change with respect to strain was noticed under tensile test resulting from tunneling effect which induced nonlinearity in the electrical signals. During fracture tests, prior to crack propagation, different trends in piezoresistivity as a function of displacement were observed, depending on the CNT loading, that is, linear and nonlinear behavior at CNT content of 0.5 and 0.75 wt%, respectively. The nanocomposite could simultaneously monitor damage initiation and extension with the onset of crack growth by showing abrupt increase in normalized resistance, and two different failure modes can be distinguished including abrupt and crack extensions. It was concluded that any abrupt jump in normalized resistance could be used as an indicator for damage initiation in the specimen.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering College of Engineering, Qatar University Doha Qatar
Department of Mechanical Engineering Politecnico di Milano Milan Italy
Materials Science and Engineering Area, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Móstoles Madrid Spain
Funding
Qatar National Research Fund
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Shakil U. A. · Polym. Compos. · 2020 · 1
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.007 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.05910.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.059 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.10321410.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103214 ↗
5. Qiao Z. · Polym. Compos. · 2020 · 1
6. Zare Y. · Polym. Compos. · 2019 · 1
7. Zare Y. · Polym. Compos. · 2019 · 41 · 1
8. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/3/00910.1088/0964-1726/15/3/009 ↗
9. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa810510.1088/1361-665X/aa8105 ↗
10. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/9/09500410.1088/0964-1726/24/9/095004 ↗
11. 10.1088/1361-665X/aae66810.1088/1361-665X/aae668 ↗
12. 10.1088/1361-665X/ab147e10.1088/1361-665X/ab147e ↗
13. Krainoi A. · Polym. Compos. · 2019 · 41 · 1
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.09810.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.098 ↗
15. 10.1039/C5NR01354B10.1039/C5NR01354B ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.020 ↗
17. 10.1080/15583724.2012.70374710.1080/15583724.2012.703747 ↗
18. 10.1016/B978-0-08-102641-0.00011-610.1016/B978-0-08-102641-0.00011-6 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.10410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.104 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10791810.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107918 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.12.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2015.12.002 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.06110.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.061 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.01.06810.1016/j.polymer.2017.01.068 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.025 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.sna.2016.12.01110.1016/j.sna.2016.12.011 ↗
26. Wang X. · Sens. Actuators A Phys. · 2018 · 285 · 127
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.027 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.020 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.23410.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.234 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.012 ↗
31. 10.1080/19475411.2011.65150810.1080/19475411.2011.651508 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.15110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.151 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.003 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.052 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.03010.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.030 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.010 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2326010.1002/pc.23260 ↗
38. 10.1002/pc.2325010.1002/pc.23250 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.02.02710.1016/j.polymer.2019.02.027 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.05110.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.051 ↗
41. V.Mirjalili P.Hubert Effect of carbon nanotube dispersion on the fracture toughness of polymers ICCM‐17 17th Int. Conf. Compos. Mater. (2009) 27‐31.
42. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.03410.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.034 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.02810.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.028 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.06610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.066 ↗
45. 10.3390/s14061004210.3390/s140610042 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.08110.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.081 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.004 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.08.05410.1016/j.polymer.2014.08.054 ↗
49. 10.1155/2012/65243810.1155/2012/652438 ↗
50. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/47/47550310.1088/0957-4484/19/47/475503 ↗