Mechanical, thermal, and ablative properties between graphene oxide and graphitic carbon nitride based carbon/phenolic composites: a comparative study
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article, we investigated the interfacial, thermal and ablative properties of two nanofillers‐filled carbon/phenolic (CF/PR) composites. In particular, graphene oxide (GO) and graphitic carbon nitride (g‐C3N4) were used to produce lowly loaded (0.1 wt%) composites. The ablative properties of the composites were researched through an oxygen–acetylene flame torch test and were characterized through analysis of the post‐burning morphology, ablation depth and width. GO‐ and g‐C3N4‐filled composites showed 62.02 and 22.36% improvement in ablation resistance compared with the pristine, respectively, even with different mechanisms. The proposed mechanism of GO‐filled composite is that GO may significantly contribute to increasing the graphitization of the fiber surface and further improving the thermal resistance to high‐temperature ablation. However, thicker fiber diameter and charred layer of ablative zone in g‐C3N4‐filled composite can dissipate the flammable gases and improve the anti‐oxidation. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:E1928–E1938, 2018. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Flame retardant materials and properties · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CAS Key Laboratory of Carbon Materials Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences Taiyuan 030001 People's Republic of China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 People's Republic of China
National Engineering Laboratory for Carbon Fiber Technology Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences Taiyuan 030001 People's Republic of China
Funding
National Nature Foundation of China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.10.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2012.10.005 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.02210.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.022 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.006 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.07.02010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.07.020 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.05210.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.052 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2015.01.015 ↗
7. 10.1039/C5RA11826C10.1039/C5RA11826C ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.02710.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.027 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.07.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2013.07.019 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.015 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.06.01510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2017.06.015 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2332010.1002/pc.23320 ↗
13. 10.1002/pi.437510.1002/pi.4375 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.12.03610.1016/j.commatsci.2014.12.036 ↗
15. 10.1039/C5NR00665A10.1039/C5NR00665A ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.005 ↗
17. 10.1039/C4NR03145H10.1039/C4NR03145H ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.02910.1016/j.carbon.2012.07.029 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.04210.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.042 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2336910.1002/pc.23369 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.01510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.03.015 ↗
23. 10.1016/0008-6223(83)90165-310.1016/0008-6223(83)90165-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.011 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbon.2003.11.01810.1016/j.carbon.2003.11.018 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.11.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2010.11.011 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.04.02910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.04.029 ↗