Rheological and dynamic mechanical characteristics of rotationally moldable linear low‐density polyethylene fumed silica nanocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
In rotational molding process, polymer powders undergo a cycle of heating, melting, cooling, and subsequent solidification in the mold. Resins, like linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE), are used in this process on a large scale mainly because of its good mechanical properties and excellent thermal stability. Yet, incorporation of additives is necessary to further improve the visco‐elastic, thermal as well as melt flow properties of the resin. This study investigates the effects of nanocomposites of fumed silica (FS) with rotationally moldable LLDPE. Thermal transitions in the LLDPE‐FS nanocomposites were investigated and correlated with their melt flow characteristics. The effect on melt processing during rotational molding and compounding, were analyzed by melt flow index and torque rheometry studies. A suitable blend of FS in LLDPE has been recommended for rotational molding based on rheological studies and dynamic mechanical analysis. POLYM. COMPOS., 37:2995–3002, 2016. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Foaming and Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering BITS Pilani K K Birla Goa Campus NH‐17B Zuarinagar Goa 403726 India
Funding
Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India · University Grant Commission (UGC), Govt. of India
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.12.03510.1016/j.polymer.2007.12.035 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10853-009-3894-910.1007/s10853-009-3894-9 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.03810.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.038 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.11.00610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.11.006 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.10.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.10.009 ↗
6. Cassagnau P. · Polymer · 2003 · 44
7. Yilgor E. · Polymer · 2011 · 52
8. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.07.05710.1016/j.polymer.2005.07.057 ↗
9. Jancar J. · Polymer · 2010 · 51
10. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4117(199908)16:4<169::AID-PPSC169>3.0.CO;2-H10.1002/(SICI)1521-4117(199908)16:4<169::AID-PPSC169>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
11. Luyt A.S. · Polym. Bull · 2010 · 66
12. 10.1007/BF0321899910.1007/BF03218999 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tca.2008.12.01110.1016/j.tca.2008.12.011 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.01210.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.012 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.02.00410.1016/j.mechmat.2013.02.004 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.00210.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.002 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.1162410.1002/app.11624 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.02210.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.022 ↗
19. 10.1002/pen.2075110.1002/pen.20751 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.09210.1016/j.matdes.2013.04.092 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.10.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2012.10.001 ↗
22. Kim S.H. · Polymer · 2003 · 44
23. 10.1007/BF0321830910.1007/BF03218309 ↗
24. 10.1080/0021846060071361810.1080/00218460600713618 ↗
25. Zhou J.‐H. · Polymer · 2006 · 47
26. Zhang J. · Polymer · 2008 · 49
27. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.06.00410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.06.004 ↗
28. 10.1002/pen.2016510.1002/pen.20165 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.05.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.05.005 ↗
30. Kulikov O. · Fluid Mech · 2001 · 98 · 107
31. Kulikov O. · Fluid Mech · 2002 · 107 · 133
32. 10.1002/pen.1048710.1002/pen.10487 ↗
33. 10.1002/pen.2003510.1002/pen.20035 ↗
34. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.1610.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.16 ↗
35. Huang Y. · Adv. Polym. Technol · 2004 · 23
36. 10.1016/0032-3861(95)93586-B10.1016/0032-3861(95)93586-B ↗
37. 10.1080/0091403770807521810.1080/00914037708075218 ↗
38. 10.1002/pen.2329910.1002/pen.23299 ↗
39. 10.3139/978344641281110.3139/9783446412811 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.09.01010.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.09.010 ↗
41. Crawford R.J. · Plast. Rubber Compos. Process. Appl · 1992 · 17 · 22