Effects of environmental exposure on tribological properties of Arhar particulate/epoxy composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The solid particle erosion behavior of Arhar particulate epoxy composites with 5, 10, and 15 wt% particulate content has been characterized. The Arhar particulate epoxy composites have been fabricated using hand lay‐up technique, and samples have been exposed to different environmental conditions, such as dry, saline, mineral water, kerosene, and subzero, before erosion test. The effect of different environments on erosion wear rate is investigated for all the composites. The rate of erosion at which Arhar particulate epoxy composites undergo when subjected to various impingement angles (30, 45, 60, and 90°) and at particle speeds (v = 86, 101, and 119 m/s) using air jet erosion test rig has been evaluated. Erosion behavior of Arhar particulate composites is found to be less when compared with neat epoxy material. Normal samples showed semibrittle erosive behavior. Erosive wear rate is more in samples with 15 wt% particulate content. Erosion wear is higher in samples immersed in saline water. Erosive wear behavior samples immersed in saline water, mineral water, and kerosene, which is found to be semibrittle. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:3102–3109, 2018. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Erosion and Abrasive Machining · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering Department NIT Warangal Warangal Telangana India
Mechanical Engineering Department NIT Jalandhar Jalandhar Punjab India
Funding
National Institute of Technology, Warangal for providing infrastructure to carry out this work and also SERB-DST government of INDIA
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pi.145310.1002/pi.1453 ↗
2. 10.1002/pi.424310.1002/pi.4243 ↗
3. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980906)69:10<1891::AID-APP1>3.0.CO;2-910.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19980906)69:10<1891::AID-APP1>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
4. 10.1002/pi.165210.1002/pi.1652 ↗
5. 10.1023/A:102658340489910.1023/A:1026583404899 ↗
6. 10.1080/1023666X.2014.88001610.1080/1023666X.2014.880016 ↗
7. 10.1002/mame.20100009510.1002/mame.201000095 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.wear.2009.07.02110.1016/j.wear.2009.07.021 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.07.14410.1016/j.msea.2006.07.144 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.11810.1016/j.wear.2005.02.118 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.07.00110.1016/j.wear.2006.07.001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.03010.1016/j.wear.2006.12.030 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.08.01210.1016/j.wear.2006.08.012 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00855-910.1016/S0043-1648(01)00855-9 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.004 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0043-1648(02)00063-710.1016/S0043-1648(02)00063-7 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00210-510.1016/S0266-3538(02)00210-5 ↗
18. Gupta A. · Int. J. Polym. Sci. · 2011 · 10 · 2011
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.03310.1016/j.matdes.2008.10.033 ↗
20. Das G. · J. Ind. Text. · 2016
21. Mohanty R.J. · J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. · 2015
22. Jena H. · Adv. Polym. Technol. · 2016
23. 10.1002/pc.2264810.1002/pc.22648 ↗
24. G.Raghavendra S.Ojha S.K.Acharya andS.K.Pal2 2537 48(2013).10.1177/0021998313499955 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.1027210.1002/pc.10272 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.005 ↗
27. 10.1002/pen.2206310.1002/pen.22063 ↗
28. 10.1023/A:101963351548110.1023/A:1019633515481 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.10.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.10.009 ↗
30. Latha P.S. · J. Ind. Text. · 2015 · 3 · 46
31. 10.1016/j.wear.2005.01.03910.1016/j.wear.2005.01.039 ↗
32. Pati P.R. · Adv. Polym. Technol. · 2015 · 1 · 34