Effect of epoxidized soybean oil on mechanical properties of woven jute fabric reinforced aromatic and aliphatic epoxy resin composites
Source abstract
Abstract
A systematic study was performed to describe the effect of epoxidized soybean oil (ESO) on storage modulus, glass transition temperature (Tg) and mechanical properties in epoxy resin composites reinforced by jute fabric. In addition to aromatic diglycidylether of bisphenol‐A (DGEBA) resin, a glycerol (GER)‐and a pentaerythritol (PER)‐based aliphatic resin was applied as base resin, which can be also synthesized from renewable feedstock. Based on strip tensile test results, the usual alkali treatment of jute fabric was avoided. By increasing the ESO‐content in aliphatic composites the Tg increases, whereas in case of DGEBA, it decreases. The results indicate that although ESO has a significant softening effect, the jute fiber‐reinforced DGEBA composite can be replaced without significant compromise in mechanical properties by a potentially fully bio‐based composite consisting of 25 mass% ESO‐containing aliphatic PER‐reinforced by jute fibers. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:884–892, 2017. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer composites and self-healing · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Polymer Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Budapest University of Technology and Economics Műegyetem rkp. 3‐9. H‐1111 Budapest Hungary
Funding
Development of quality-oriented and harmonized R+D+I strategy and functional model at BME · János Bolyai Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Science · New Szechenyi Plan · NFÜ · Talent care and cultivation in the scientific workshops of BME · TAMOP
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.01.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.01.001 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.07.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.07.001 ↗
3. 10.1080/03602559.2010.51233810.1080/03602559.2010.512338 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10924-012-0418-510.1007/s10924-012-0418-5 ↗
5. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.2510.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.25 ↗
6. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.3210.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.32 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10924-014-0673-810.1007/s10924-014-0673-8 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.01010.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.010 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.07310.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.073 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00169-910.1016/S0266-3538(98)00169-9 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.02510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.03.025 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.10.01510.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.10.015 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.19610.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.196 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.07910.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.079 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.00510.1016/j.msea.2010.09.005 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.04710.1016/j.msea.2011.03.047 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.03310.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.033 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.06810.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.068 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2013.02.033 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.07910.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.079 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.10610.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.106 ↗
23. 10.1177/073168441349727710.1177/0731684413497277 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.10210.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.102 ↗
25. 10.1039/C3GC41655K10.1039/C3GC41655K ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.08610.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.086 ↗