Injection molded self‐hybrid composites based on polypropylene and natural fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
Self‐hybrid thermoplastic composites (combination of two fiber sizes) were obtained by injection molding using pine or agave fibers with polypropylene (PP). The effect of self‐hybridization was determined through mechanical properties and water absorption for different total fiber contents between 10 and 30% wt. The results showed that impact strength (30% of fiber) and tensile modulus (20% of fiber) were improved by self‐hybridization compared with composites formulated with only one fiber size. Flexural properties were not improved by self‐hybridization. On the other hand, the combination of two fiber sizes had no effect on the water absorption behavior of these composites. Overall, the total fiber content was found to be an important parameter with 20% being the optimum condition where self‐hybridization provides the best mechanical properties. POLYM. COMPOS., 35:1798–1806, 2014. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties · Polymer Foaming and Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Ingeniería Química Universidad de Guadalajara Blvd. Gral. Marcelino García Barragán # 1451 Guadalajara Jalisco 44430 México
Departamento de Madera Celulosa y Papel, Universidad de Guadalajara Carretera Guadalajara‐Nogales km 15.5, Las Agujas Zapopan Jalisco 45510 México
Department of Chemical Engineering and CERMA Université Laval Quebec City Quebec G1V 0A6 Canada
Funding
Mexican National Council for Science and Technology
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12221-010-0464-310.1007/s12221-010-0464-3 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.04310.1016/j.carbpol.2011.04.043 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.02310.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.023 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10853-008-2683-110.1007/s10853-008-2683-1 ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0054046810.1007/BF00540468 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.06010.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.060 ↗
7. 10.1007/s10443-009-9111-910.1007/s10443-009-9111-9 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00071-910.1016/S1359-835X(01)00071-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.03310.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.033 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00261-610.1016/S0266-3538(03)00261-6 ↗
11. 10.1002/app.3526410.1002/app.35264 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10924-010-0245-510.1007/s10924-010-0245-5 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2007.11.02410.1016/j.cej.2007.11.024 ↗
14. 10.1177/00219983760100010110.1177/002199837601000101 ↗
15. Crank J. · 1975
16. Ashori A. · J. Polym. Environ. · 2010 · 99 · 4661
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.00510.1016/j.msea.2010.09.005 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2057810.1002/pc.20578 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2009.03.020 ↗
20. N.Stark andM.Berger. “Effect of Species and Particle Size on Properties of Wood‐Flour‐Filled Polypropylene Composites” Proceedings of Functional Fillers in San Diego California (1997).
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.01310.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.013 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.2391610.1002/app.23916 ↗
23. Abdul Khalil H.P.S. · Bioresources · 2011 · 6 · 104310.15376/biores.6.2.1043-1052 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.027 ↗