A review of bioreactor technology used for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Cellulases are costly, a principal challenge of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials for bioethanol production. For an efficient cellulase production, fungi are preferred over bacteria due to their permeation capability and versatile substrate consumption. Some limitations in the enzymatic hydrolysis step prevent the process to be economically feasible. Different strategies have been investigated to overcome these limitations, including genetic engineering, enzyme recycling, high solid loadings, pretreatment technologies, supplementation of cellulases with additives and application of nanomaterials for improving the thermal and pH stability of cellulases. Several studies have been performed in various bioreactors with the target to procure higher yields of glucose in the enzymatic hydrolysis step. The key factors for designing a bioreactor include efficient mixing, sufficient mass transfer, low shear stress, low foaming problems and low consumption of water and energy. In this scenario, different bioreactor configurations, including stirred tank bioreactor, horizontal rotating tubular bioreactor, airlift bioreactor, membrane bioreactor, reciprocating plate bioreactor, solid-state fermentation bioreactors have been reviewed for cellulase production with the aim to investigate main factors for designing a bioreactor.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Biofuel production and bioconversion · Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction · Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Abdella A, Mazeed T, El-Baz A et al (2016) Production of β-glucosidase from wheat bran and glycerol by Aspergillus niger in stirred tank and rotating fibrous bed bioreactors. Process Biochem 51(10):1331–133710.1016/j.procbio.2016.07.004 ↗
2. Aditiya HB, Mahlia TMI, Chong WT et al (2016) Second generation bioethanol production: a critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 66:631–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2016.07.01510.1016/J.RSER.2016.07.015 ↗
3. Ahamed A, Vermette P (2008a) Culture-based strategies to enhance cellulase enzyme production from Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 in bioreactor culture conditions. Biochem Eng J 40:399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BEJ.2007.11.03010.1016/J.BEJ.2007.11.030 ↗
4. Ahamed A, Vermette P (2008b) Enhanced enzyme production from mixed cultures of Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and Aspergillus niger LMA grown as fed batch in a stirred tank bioreactor. Biochem Eng J 42:41–4610.1016/j.bej.2008.05.007 ↗
5. Ahamed A, Vermette P (2010) Effect of mechanical agitation on the production of cellulases by Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 in a draft-tube airlift bioreactor. Biochem Eng J 49:379–38710.1016/j.bej.2010.01.014 ↗
6. Alam MZ, Mamun AA, Qudsieh IY et al (2009) Solid state bioconversion of oil palm empty fruit bunches for cellulase enzyme production using a rotary drum bioreactor. Biochem Eng J 46:61–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BEJ.2009.03.01010.1016/J.BEJ.2009.03.010 ↗
7. Alkasrawi M, Eriksson T, Börjesson J et al (2003) The effect of Tween-20 on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of softwood to ethanol. Enzyme Microb Technol 33:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(03)00087-510.1016/S0141-0229(03)00087-5 ↗
8. Al-Zuhair S (2008) The effect of crystallinity of cellulose on the rate of reducing sugars production by heterogeneous enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 99:4078–408510.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.003 ↗
9. Al-Zuhair S, Fan YL, Chui KS, Rizwan S (2007) Kinetics of Aspergillus niger cellulase inhibition by reducing sugar produced by the hydrolysis of carboxymethylcellulose. Int J Chem React Eng 5:1
10. Al-Zuhair S, Al-Hosany M, Zooba Y et al (2013) Development of a membrane bioreactor for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Renew Energy 56:85–8910.1016/j.renene.2012.09.044 ↗
11. Amano Y, Nozaki K, Araki T et al (2001) Reactivities of cellulases from fungi towards ribbon-type bacterial cellulose and band-shaped bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 8:267–27410.1023/A:1015167304364 ↗
12. Andrić P, Meyer AS, Jensen PA, Dam-Johansen K (2010a) Reactor design for minimizing product inhibition during enzymatic lignocellulose hydrolysis: II. Quantification of inhibition and suitability of membrane reactors. Biotechnol Adv 28:407–42510.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.02.005 ↗
13. Andrić P, Meyer AS, Jensen PA, Dam-Johansen K (2010b) Reactor design for minimizing product inhibition during enzymatic lignocellulose hydrolysis: I. Significance and mechanism of cellobiose and glucose inhibition on cellulolytic enzymes. Biotechnol Adv 28:308–32410.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.003 ↗
14. Ang SK, Shaza EM, Adibah Y et al (2013) Production of cellulases and xylanase by Aspergillus fumigatus SK1 using untreated oil palm trunk through solid state fermentation. Process Biochem 48:1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2013.06.01910.1016/j.procbio.2013.06.019 ↗
15. Audet J, Gagnon H, Lounes M, Thibault J (1998) Polysaccharide production: experimental comparison of the performance of four mixing devices. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 19:45–5210.1007/s004490050481 ↗
16. Balat M, Balat H, Öz C (2008) Progress in bioethanol processing. Prog Energy Combust Sci 34:551–57310.1016/j.pecs.2007.11.001 ↗
17. Bansal P, Hall M, Realff MJ et al (2009) Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Adv 27:833–84810.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.06.005 ↗
18. Bélafi-Bakó K, Koutinas A, Nemestóthy N et al (2006) Continuous enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis in a tubular membrane bioreactor. Enzyme Microb Technol 38:155–16110.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.05.012 ↗
19. Berlin A, Gilkes N, Kurabi A et al (2005) Weak lignin-binding enzymes: a novel approach to improve activity of cellulases for hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121:0163–0170. https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:121:1-3:016310.1385/ABAB:121:1-3:0163 ↗
20. Blakebrough N, Moresi M (1981) Scale-up of whey fermentation in a pilot-scale fermenter. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 12:173–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0100833910.1007/BF01008339 ↗
21. Börjesson J, Peterson R, Tjerneld F (2007) Enhanced enzymatic conversion of softwood lignocellulose by poly (ethylene glycol) addition. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:754–76210.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.06.006 ↗
22. Brijwani K, Oberoi HS, Vadlani PV (2010) Production of a cellulolytic enzyme system in mixed-culture solid-state fermentation of soybean hulls supplemented with wheat bran. Process Biochem 45:120–12810.1016/j.procbio.2009.08.015 ↗
23. Brijwani K, Vadlani PV, Hohn KL, Maier DE (2011) Experimental and theoretical analysis of a novel deep-bed solid-state bioreactor for cellulolytic enzymes production. Biochem Eng J 58:110–12310.1016/j.bej.2011.09.004 ↗
24. Bück A, Casciatori FP, Thoméo JC, Tsotsas E (2015) Model-based control of enzyme yield in solid-state fermentation. Proc Eng 102:362–37110.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.163 ↗
25. Bulakhov AG, Volkov PV, Rozhkova AM et al (2017) Using an inducible promoter of a gene encoding Penicillium verruculosum glucoamylase for production of enzyme preparations with enhanced cellulase performance. PLoS ONE 12:e0170404. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.017040410.1371/journal.pone.0170404 ↗
26. Cáceres R, Coromina N, Malińska K, Marfà O (2015) Evolution of process control parameters during extended co-composting of green waste and solid fraction of cattle slurry to obtain growing media. Bioresour Technol 179:398–40610.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.051 ↗
27. Carvajal D, Marchisio DL, Bensaid S, Fino D (2011) Enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomasses via CFD and experiments. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:7518–752510.1021/ie201673t ↗
28. Caspeta L, Caro-Bermúdez MA, Ponce-Noyola T, Martinez A (2014) Enzymatic hydrolysis at high-solids loadings for the conversion of agave bagasse to fuel ethanol. Appl Energy 113:277–28610.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.036 ↗
29. Castro AM, Castilho LR, Freire DMG (2015) Performance of a fixed-bed solid-state fermentation bioreactor with forced aeration for the production of hydrolases by Aspergillus awamori. Biochem Eng J 93:303–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BEJ.2014.10.01610.1016/J.BEJ.2014.10.016 ↗
30. Catapano G, Czermak P, Eibl R et al (2009) Bioreactor design and scale-up. In: Eibl R, Eibl D, Pörtner R, Catapano G, Czermak P (eds) Cell and tissue reaction engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 173–25910.1007/978-3-540-68182-3_5 ↗
31. Chen H-Z, Zhao Z-M, Li H-Q (2014a) The effect of gas double-dynamic on mass distribution in solid-state fermentation. Enzyme Microb Technol 58–59:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENZMICTEC.2014.02.00710.1016/J.ENZMICTEC.2014.02.007 ↗
32. Chen H, Shao M, Li H (2014b) Effects of gas periodic stimulation on key enzyme activity in gas double-dynamic solid state fermentation (GDD-SSF). Enzyme Microb Technol 56:35–3910.1016/j.enzmictec.2013.12.015 ↗
33. Chen W-C, Lin Y-C, Ciou Y-L et al (2017) Producing bioethanol from pretreated-wood dust by simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation process. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 79:43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTICE.2017.04.02510.1016/J.JTICE.2017.04.025 ↗
34. Chisti MY (1989) Bioreactors A. Elsevier Applied Science, London
35. Chisti Y (1998) Pneumatically agitated bioreactors in industrial and environmental bioprocessing: hydrodynamics, hydraulics, and transport phenomena. Appl Mech Rev 51:33–11210.1115/1.3098989 ↗
36. Chisti Y, Jauregui-Haza UJ (2002) Oxygen transfer and mixing in mechanically agitated airlift bioreactors. Biochem Eng J 10:143–15310.1016/S1369-703X(01)00174-7 ↗
37. Chisti MY, Moo-Young M (1987) Airlift reactors: characteristics, applications and design considerations. Chem Eng Commun 60:195–24210.1080/00986448708912017 ↗
38. Chisti Y, Moo-Young M (1988) Gas holdup behaviour in fermentation broths and other non-Newtonian fluids in pneumatically agitated reactors. Chem Eng J 39:B31–B3610.1016/0300-9467(88)80028-5 ↗
39. Choi KH, Chisti Y, Moo-Young M (1995) Influence of the gas–liquid separator design on hydrodynamic and mass transfer performance of split-channel airlift reactors. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 62:327–33210.1002/jctb.280620403 ↗
40. Coffman AM, Li Q, Ju L-K (2014) Effect of natural and pretreated soybean hulls on enzyme production by Trichoderma reesei. J Am Oil Chem Soc 91:1331–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-014-2480-810.1007/s11746-014-2480-8 ↗
41. Corrêa LJ, Badino AC, Cruz AJG (2016) Mixing design for enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse: methodology for selection of impeller configuration. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 39:285–29410.1007/s00449-015-1512-6 ↗
42. Crespo CF, Badshah M, Alvarez MT, Mattiasson B (2012) Ethanol production by continuous fermentation of d-(+)-cellobiose, d-(+)-xylose and sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate using the thermoanaerobe Caloramator boliviensis. Bioresour Technol 103:186–19110.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.020 ↗
43. Cunha F, Esperança M, Florencio C et al (2015) Three-phasic fermentation systems for enzyme production with sugarcane bagasse in stirred tank bioreactors: effects of operational variables and cultivation method. Biochem Eng J 97:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BEJ.2015.02.00410.1016/J.BEJ.2015.02.004 ↗
44. Dasari RK, Dunaway K, Berson RE (2008) A scraped surface bioreactor for enzymatic saccharification of pretreated corn stover slurries. Energy Fuels 23:492–49710.1021/ef800434u ↗
45. Dashtban M, Schraft H, Qin W (2009) Fungal bioconversion of lignocellulosic residues; opportunities and perspectives. Int J Biol Sci 5:57810.7150/ijbs.5.578 ↗
46. Decker SR, Adney WS, Jennings E et al (2003) Automated filter paper assay for determination of cellulase activity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 107:689–70310.1385/ABAB:107:1-3:689 ↗
47. Deeble MF, Lee JM (1986) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic substances in an attrition bioreactor. In: Biotechnology and bioengineering symposium. Wiley, pp 277–293
48. Delabona PS, Pirota RDPB, Codima CA et al (2012) Using Amazon forest fungi and agricultural residues as a strategy to produce cellulolytic enzymes. Biomass Bioenerg 37:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.12.00610.1016/j.biombioe.2011.12.006 ↗
49. Desgranges C, Durand A (1990) Effect of pCO2 on growth, condition, and enzyme production in solid-state culture on Aspergillus niger and Trichoderma viride TS. Enzyme Microb Technol 12:546–55110.1016/0141-0229(90)90073-Y ↗
50. Dhillon GS, Oberoi HS, Kaur S et al (2011) Value-addition of agricultural wastes for augmented cellulase and xylanase production through solid-state tray fermentation employing mixed-culture of fungi. Ind Crops Prod 34:1160–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2011.04.00110.1016/J.INDCROP.2011.04.001 ↗
51. Dhillon GS, Brar SK, Kaur S et al (2012) Lactoserum as a moistening medium and crude inducer for fungal cellulase and hemicellulase induction through solid-state fermentation of apple pomace. Biomass Bioenerg 41:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2012.02.02110.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2012.02.021 ↗
52. Du J, Zhang F, Li Y et al (2014) Enzymatic liquefaction and saccharification of pretreated corn stover at high-solids concentrations in a horizontal rotating bioreactor. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 37:173–18110.1007/s00449-013-0983-6 ↗
53. Du J, Cao Y, Liu G et al (2017) Identifying and overcoming the effect of mass transfer limitation on decreased yield in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose at high solid concentrations. Bioresour Technol 229:88–9510.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.011 ↗
54. Duff SJB, Cooper DG, Fuller OM (1985) Cellulase and beta-glucosidase production by mexied culture of Trichoderma reesei rut C30 and Aspergillus phoenicis. Biotechnol Lett 7:185–19010.1007/BF01027817 ↗
55. Durand A (1998) Solid state fermentation. Biofuture 181:41–4310.1016/S0294-3506(98)80171-3 ↗
56. Durand A (2000) Solid state fermentation. Biofuture 181:41–43
57. Durand A (2003) Bioreactor designs for solid state fermentation. Biochem Eng J 13:113–12510.1016/S1369-703X(02)00124-9 ↗
58. Fakhari ME, Moraveji MK, Davarnejad R (2014) Hydrodynamics and mass transfer of oily micro-emulsions in an external loop airlift reactor. Chin J Chem Eng 22:267–27310.1016/S1004-9541(14)60050-1 ↗
59. Falkoski DL, Guimarães VM, de Almeida MN, Alfenas AC, Colodette JL, de Rezende ST (2013) undefined Chrysoporthe cubensis: a new source of cellulases and hemicellulases to application in biomass saccharification processes. Bioresour Technol 130:296–30510.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.140 ↗
60. Fernández M, Perez-Correa JR, Solar I, Agosin E (1996) Automation of a solid substrate cultivation pilot reactor. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 16:1–410.1007/s004490050278 ↗
61. Flickinger MC, Drew SW (1999) The encyclopedia of bioprocess technology: fermentation, biocatalysis, and bioseparation. Wiley, New York
62. Florencio C, Cunha FM, Badino AC, Farinas CS (2015) Validation of a novel sequential cultivation method for the production of enzymatic cocktails from Trichoderma strains. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 175:1389–140210.1007/s12010-014-1357-5 ↗
63. Fujio Y (1997) A study in the application of microbial functions to environmental cleaning and fermented foodstuffs: biotechnological aspects of solid state fermentation. Seibutsu-kogaku Kaishi 75:433–443
64. Gagnon H, Lounes M, Thibault J (1998) Power consumption and mass transfer in agitated gas–liquid columns: a comparative study. Can J Chem Eng 76:379–38910.1002/cjce.5450760306 ↗
65. Gan Q, Allen SJ, Taylor G (2002) Design and operation of an integrated membrane reactor for enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Biochem Eng J 12:223–22910.1016/S1369-703X(02)00072-4 ↗
66. Ganesh K, Joshi JB, Sawant SB (2000) Cellulase deactivation in a stirred reactor. Biochem Eng J 4:137–14110.1016/S1369-703X(99)00045-5 ↗
67. Garc’ia-Serna J, Pérez-Barrigón L, Cocero MJ (2007) New trends for design towards sustainability in chemical engineering: green engineering. Chem Eng J 133:7–3010.1016/j.cej.2007.02.028 ↗
68. Garcia-Ochoa F, Gomez E (2009) Bioreactor scale-up and oxygen transfer rate in microbial processes: an overview. Biotechnol Adv 27:153–17610.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.10.006 ↗
69. Gasparotto JM, Werle LB, Foletto EL et al (2015) Production of cellulolytic enzymes and application of crude enzymatic extract for saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 175:560–57210.1007/s12010-014-1297-0 ↗
70. Ghose TK (1987) Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59:257–26810.1351/pac198759020257 ↗
71. Ghose TK, Kostick JA (1970) A model for continuous enzymatic saccharification of cellulose with simultaneous removal of glucose syrup. Biotechnol Bioeng 12:921–94610.1002/bit.260120606 ↗
72. Ghosh UK, Upadhyay SN (2007) Gas holdup and solid-liquid mass transfer in Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids in bubble columns. Can J Chem Eng 85:825–83210.1002/cjce.5450850604 ↗
73. Girometta C, Zeffiro A, Malagodi M et al (2017) Pretreatment of alfalfa stems by wood decay fungus Perenniporia meridionalis improves cellulose degradation and minimizes the use of chemicals. Cellulose 24:3803–3813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1395-610.1007/s10570-017-1395-6 ↗
74. Gritzali M, Brown RD Jr (1979) The cellulase system of Trichoderma: relationships between purified extracellular enzymes from induced or cellulose-grown cells. ACS Publications, Washington
75. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Andersson E, Lopez-Leiva M, Mattiasson B (1981) Membrane biotechnology, co-immobilization, and aqueous two-phase systems: alternatives in bioconversion of cellulose. In: Biotechnology and bioengineering symposium (United States). University of Lund, Sweden
76. Handelsman J, Rondon MR, Brady SF et al (1998) Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: a new frontier for natural products. Chem Biol 5:R245–R24910.1016/S1074-5521(98)90108-9 ↗
77. Hanif A, Yasmeen A, Rajoka MI (2004) Induction, production, repression, and de-repression of exoglucanase synthesis in Aspergillus niger. Bioresour Technol 94:311–31910.1016/j.biortech.2003.12.013 ↗
78. He Q, Chen H (2013) Pilot-scale gas double-dynamic solid-state fermentation for the production of industrial enzymes. Food Bioprocess Technol 6:2916–292410.1007/s11947-012-0956-9 ↗
79. Helbert W, Chanzy H, Husum TL et al (2003) Fluorescent cellulose microfibrils as substrate for the detection of cellulase activity. Biomacromol 4:481–48710.1021/bm020076i ↗
80. Henley R-G, Yang RYK, Greenfield PF (1980) Enzymatic saccharification of cellulose in membrane reactors. Enzyme Microb Technol 2:206–20810.1016/0141-0229(80)90048-4 ↗
81. Hideno A, Ogbonna JC, Aoyagi H, Tanaka H (2007) Acetylation of loofa (Luffa cylindrica) sponge as immobilization carrier for bioprocesses involving cellulase. J Biosci Bioeng 103:311–31710.1263/jbb.103.311 ↗
82. Hölker U, Höfer M, Lenz J (2004) Biotechnological advantages of laboratory-scale solid-state fermentation with fungi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 64:175–18610.1007/s00253-003-1504-3 ↗
83. Hu G, Heitmann JA Jr, Rojas OJ (2009) Quantification of cellulase activity using the quartz crystal microbalance technique. Anal Chem 81:1872–188010.1021/ac802318t ↗
84. Ibrahim M (2002) Preparation of cellulose and cellulose derivative azo compounds. Cellulose 9:337–34910.1023/A:1021154204053 ↗
85. Irshad MN, Anwar Z, But HI et al (2012) The industrial applicability of purified cellulase complex indigenously produced by Trichoderma viride through solid-state bio-processing of agro-industrial and municipal paper wastes. BioResources 8:145–15710.15376/biores.8.1.145-157 ↗
86. Jagadeeswaran G, Gainey L, Prade R, Mort AJ (2016) A family of AA9 lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases in Aspergillus nidulans is differentially regulated by multiple substrates and at least one is active on cellulose and xyloglucan. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:4535–4547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7505-910.1007/s00253-016-7505-9 ↗
87. Jeoh T, Cardona MJ, Karuna N et al (2017) Mechanistic kinetic models of enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis-A review. Biotechnol Bioeng 114:1369–1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.2627710.1002/bit.26277 ↗
88. Jones EO, Lee JM (1988) Kinetic analysis of bioconversion of cellulose in attrition bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 31:35–4010.1002/bit.260310106 ↗
89. Jørgensen H, Vibe-Pedersen J, Larsen J, Felby C (2007) Liquefaction of lignocellulose at high-solids concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng 96:862–87010.1002/bit.21115 ↗
90. Juhász T, Kozma K, Szengyel Z, Réczey K (2003) Production of β-glucosidase in mixed culture of Aspergillus niger BKMF 1305 and Trichoderma reesei RUT C30. Food Technol Biotechnol 41:49–53
91. Juturu V, Wu JC (2014) Microbial cellulases: engineering, production and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 33:188–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2014.01.07710.1016/J.RSER.2014.01.077 ↗
92. Kaar WE, Holtzapple MT (1998) Benefits from Tween during enzymic hydrolysis of corn stover. Biotechnol Bioeng 59:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980820)59:4%3c419:AID-BIT4%3e3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980820)59:4<419::AID-BIT4>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
93. Karnaouri A, Topakas E, Antonopoulou I, Christakopoulos P (2014) Genomic insights into the fungal lignocellulolytic system of Myceliophthora thermophila. Front Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.0028110.3389/fmicb.2014.00281 ↗
94. Katz M, Reese ET (1968) Production of glucose by enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Appl Microbiol 16:41910.1128/AEM.16.2.419-420.1968 ↗
95. Kaya F, Heitmann JA, Joyce TW (1996) Deactivation of cellulase and hemicellulase in high shear fields. Cellul Chem Technol 30:49–56
96. Khelil O, Cheba B (2014) Thermophilic cellulolytic microorganisms from western Algerian sources: promising isolates for cellulosic biomass recycling. Proc Technol 12:519–52810.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.524 ↗
97. Kim MH, Lee SB, Ryu DDY, Reese ET (1982) Surface deactivation of cellulase and its prevention. Enzyme Microb Technol 4:99–10310.1016/0141-0229(82)90090-4 ↗
98. King BC, Donnelly MK, Bergstrom GC et al (2009) An optimized microplate assay system for quantitative evaluation of plant cell wall-degrading enzyme activity of fungal culture extracts. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:1033–104410.1002/bit.22151 ↗
99. Kogo T, Yoshida Y, Koganei K et al (2017) Production of rice straw hydrolysis enzymes by the fungi Trichoderma reesei and Humicola insolens using rice straw as a carbon source. Bioresour Technol 233:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2017.01.07510.1016/J.BIORTECH.2017.01.075 ↗
100. Kolasa M, Ahring BK, Lübeck PS, Lübeck M (2014) Co-cultivation of Trichoderma reesei RutC30 with three black Aspergillus strains facilitates efficient hydrolysis of pretreated wheat straw and shows promises for on-site enzyme production. Bioresour Technol 169:143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2014.06.08210.1016/J.BIORTECH.2014.06.082 ↗