Compatibilization of polyethylene/polyamide 6 blend nanocomposite films
Source abstract
Abstract
Polymer blends of incompatible components need to undergo compatibilization, in order to give rise to a blend with good physical properties. At the same way, polymer/clay nanocomposites show this problem because of different chemical nature of the polymer matrix and of the clay. Compatibilization is therefore more necessary if an incompatible polymer blend is filled with an organomodified clay in order to give a final material with good properties. In this work, a polyethylene/polyamide 6 blend filled with an organomodified clay has been compatibilized with a maleic anhydride grafted SEBS (styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene) copolymer and a glicidylmethacrylate‐ethylene copolymer. The results show that compatibilization improves the mechanical properties in terms of elongation at break, as well as the rheological properties under nonisothermal elongational flow; furthermore, an unexpected effect has been found, since going from the isotropic to the anisotropic material, a fragile‐ductile transition occurs, with a significant increase of the elongation values, while a small reduction of the elastic modulus was found, because of the lower crystallinity in comparison to isotropic samples. POLYM. COMPOS., 36:992–998, 2015. © 2015 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale, dei Materiali, Università di Palermo Viale delle Scienze, Ed. 6 90128 Palermo Italy
Facoltà di Ingegneria e Architettura, Università degli Studi di Enna “Kore”, Cittadella Universitaria 94100 Enna Italy
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/app.3464810.1002/app.34648 ↗
2. 10.1080/03602559.2011.63984010.1080/03602559.2011.639840 ↗
3. 10.1002/macp.20060033210.1002/macp.200600332 ↗
4. 10.1007/0-306-48244-410.1007/0-306-48244-4 ↗
5. 10.3139/978344643650310.3139/9783446436503 ↗
6. 10.1002/mame.20120044910.1002/mame.201200449 ↗
7. 10.1023/A:102230870523110.1023/A:1022308705231 ↗
8. 10.1002/pen.2079210.1002/pen.20792 ↗
9. 10.1002/app.1324410.1002/app.13244 ↗
10. K.Kusmono Z.A.Mohd Ishak W.S.Chow T.Takeichi andH.Rochmadi Eur. Polym. J. 44 1023(2008).10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.01.019 ↗
11. 10.1002/pen.1089910.1002/pen.10899 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.09.00610.1016/j.polymer.2003.09.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.08.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2008.08.009 ↗
14. 10.1002/polb.2040810.1002/polb.20408 ↗
15. 10.1002/cjce.545080061010.1002/cjce.5450800610 ↗
16. 10.1002/pen.2010810.1002/pen.20108 ↗
17. 10.1021/ma035207210.1021/ma0352072 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.04.00810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.04.008 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.07.02910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.07.029 ↗
20. M.C.Mistretta M.Ceraulo F.P.La Mantia andM.Morreale AIP Conf. Proc. 1599 434(2014).10.1063/1.4876871 ↗
21. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.8410.3144/expresspolymlett.2013.84 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.12.00910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.12.009 ↗
23. M.C.Mistretta P.Fontana M.Ceraulo M.Morreale andF.P.La Mantia Polym. Degrad. Stab. 112 192(2015).10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.01.002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.12.01710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.12.017 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.12.02110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.12.021 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.04.01210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.04.012 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.02.00710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.02.007 ↗
28. 10.1002/mame.20029001910.1002/mame.200290019 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.01.00110.1016/j.polymer.2003.01.001 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.03.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.03.009 ↗