Effect of filler dispersion on the electrical conductivity and mechanical properties of carbon/polypropylene composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Conducting carbon/polypropylene composites containing a mixed filler of crystalline natural graphite powder, carbon black, and multiwalled carbon nanotubes have been prepared. The effect of the filler dispersion on the electrical conductivity and mechanical properties has been studied. Keeping the graphite content constant and increasing the ratio of carbon black to nanotubes, the conductivity and the flexural modulus increased linearly at different graphite contents. Graphite aggregates on the cross sections were analyzed by optical microscopy to characterize the dispersion of graphite. The results of the optical microscopy studies showed that the dispersion of graphite is affected by the composition and amount of the nanofiller system. Based on the observations simplified morphological models were set up, that allowed to explain the change in the electrical and mechanical properties of the composites of different compositions. POLYM. COMPOS., 34:1195–1203, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Polymer Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics H‐1111 Budapest Műegyetem rkp. 3 Hungary
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Stauffer D. · 1994
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.04110.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.041 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.12.05610.1016/j.jcis.2009.12.056 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.02910.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.029 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.06410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.064 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.09710.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.097 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.05.10610.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.05.106 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.03.03110.1016/j.egypro.2012.03.031 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.05410.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.02.054 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.snb.2005.03.06810.1016/j.snb.2005.03.068 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0304-3886(99)00041-810.1016/S0304-3886(99)00041-8 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.2229710.1002/app.22297 ↗
14. 10.5254/1.353820910.5254/1.3538209 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00719-810.1016/S0032-3861(98)00719-8 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1219610.1103/PhysRevB.59.12196 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.09.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2011.09.009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.05410.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.054 ↗
19. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.3710.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.37 ↗
20. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.6810.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.68 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.018 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.04910.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.049 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.004 ↗
24. 10.1002/polb.2201010.1002/polb.22010 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.09610.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.10.096 ↗
26. Derieth T. · J. New Mater. Elect. Syst., · 2008 · 11 · 21
27. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.009 ↗
28. Baofeng Z. · Adv. Mater. Res., · 2012 · 472 · 1059
29. Smits F.M. · AT&T Tech. J., · 1958 · 711 · 37
30. Mironov V.S. · Polym. Test., · 2007 · 547 · 26
31. Li J.C. · Phys. Procedia, · 2012 · 344 · 32
32. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.1710.3144/expresspolymlett.2012.17 ↗