Void content analysis and processing issues to minimize defects in liquid composite molding
Source abstract
Abstract
This investigation aims to study the impact of key process parameters dealing with the resin impregnation of fibrous reinforcements used in Liquid Composite Molding (LCM). The process parameters are the flow front velocity, the inlet mold pressure and the bleeding flow rate. The experimental setup consists of a computer‐assisted injection system and a Resin Transfer Molding (RTM) mold that allows monitoring the progression of the flow front and study the effects of resin bleeding and applying post‐fill resin pressure during cure (also known as “mold packing”). Three sets of RTM injections were carried out with a vinyl ester resin and a bidirectional 0°/90° E‐glass noncrimp fabrics under (1) constant injection pressure, (2) constant injection flow rate, and (3) bleeding as well as mold packing after filling. The quality of injected parts was evaluated by standard void content analysis based on ASTM burn‐off (D2734) tests. The experimental results are consistent with published data and with predictions of the optimal impregnation velocity obtained from capillary rise tests. This study also shows that the impregnation of fibrous reinforcements in LCM can be improved through various injection strategies, namely monitoring of the flow front velocity and specific post‐filling procedures. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:109–120, 2019. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Center of Research on High Performance Polymers and Composites (CREPEC), École Polytechnique de Montréal, Campus de l'Université de Montréal Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Canada Research Chairs
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. J.Leclerc Amélioration du procédé RTM par l'optimisation des paramètres d'injection Master Thesis École Polytechnique de Montréal (2008).
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.09.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2008.09.008 ↗
3. Ghiorse S.R. · SAMPE Q. · 1993 · 24 · 54
4. Judd N.C.W. · SAMPE J. · 1978 · 14 · 10
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.02310.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.023 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.04.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2007.04.010 ↗
7. 10.1007/s12289-009-0630-610.1007/s12289-009-0630-6 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.013 ↗
9. 10.1177/07316844930120120710.1177/073168449301201207 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.75015010510.1002/pc.750150105 ↗
11. 10.1002/aic.69041101010.1002/aic.690411010 ↗
12. R.C.PetersonandR.E.Robertson “ASM/ESD Advanced Composites Conference ” Chicago IL. (1992).
13. S. G.AdvaniandP.Simacek “MS&T'08 Conference ” Pittsburgh PA. (2008).
14. 10.1016/0263-8223(94)90071-X10.1016/0263-8223(94)90071-X ↗
15. 10.1051/epjap:200110410.1051/epjap:2001104 ↗
16. 10.1002/pen.76032050410.1002/pen.760320504 ↗
17. 10.1002/pen.76035100610.1002/pen.760351006 ↗
18. 10.1007/s12289-012-1111-x10.1007/s12289-012-1111-x ↗
19. LeBel F. · Open J. Inorg. Non‐Met. Mater. · 2012 · 2 · 25
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.03.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2013.03.016 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.1066910.1002/pc.10669 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.1059510.1002/pc.10595 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.03210.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.032 ↗
24. 10.1017/S002185960008864X10.1017/S002185960008864X ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.05.01110.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.05.011 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00109-110.1016/S1359-835X(96)00109-1 ↗
27. Wood J.R. · Compos. Manuf. · 1994 · 5 · 138
28. 10.1177/002199830404558510.1177/0021998304045585 ↗
29. 10.1177/073168441141133810.1177/0731684411411338 ↗
30. Michaud V. · Transp. Porous Media · 2016 · 1
31. 10.1177/004051751247174210.1177/0040517512471742 ↗
32. M.Brandley Void modeling in resin infusion Master thesis Brigham Young University (2015).
33. 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00137-710.1016/S0266-3538(98)00137-7 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.03210.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.032 ↗
35. 10.1002/pc.1060010.1002/pc.10600 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.010 ↗
37. Goodman S. H. · 1986
38. 10.1155/2011/40608710.1155/2011/406087 ↗
39. 10.1155/2011/96419310.1155/2011/964193 ↗
40. F.Rezanezhad Experimental study of fingering flow in porous Hele‐Shaw cells Doctorat Ruperto‐Carola University of Heidelberg (2007).
41. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.021 ↗
42. F.LeBel Contrôle de la fabrication des composites par injection sur renforts Ph.D. Thesis École Polytechnique de Montréal (2012).
43. N.Patel Micro‐scale flow behavior fiber wetting and void formation in liquid composite molding Ph.D. Thesis The Ohio State University (1994).
44. 10.1002/pc.1007710.1002/pc.10077 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.005 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.02.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2011.02.005 ↗
47. 10.1080/09243046.2013.83282910.1080/09243046.2013.832829 ↗
48. 10.1177/00219983920260080210.1177/002199839202600802 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.003 ↗
50. E. V.Richards Design of an apparatus to measure gas solubilities in polymers Master Thesis University of Toronto (2001).