journal article·2016-02

Comparison of foam core sandwich panel and through‐thickness polymer pin–reinforced foam core sandwich panel subject to indentation and flatwise compression loadings

B. Abdi, S. Azwan, M.R. Abdullah, Amran Ayob, Yazid Yahya

Polymer Composites· Volume 37· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Through‐thickness polymer pin–reinforced foam core sandwich (FCS) panels are new type of composite sandwich structure as the foam core of this structure was reinforced with cylindrical polymer pins, which also rigidly connect the face sheets. These sandwich panels are made of glass fiber–reinforced polyester face sheets and closed‐cell polyurethane foam core with cylindrical polymer pins produced during fabrication process. The indentation and compression behavior of these sandwich panels were compared with common traditional sandwich panel, and it has been found that by reinforcing the foam core with cylindrical polymer pins, the indentation strength, energy absorption, and compression strength of the sandwich panels were improved significantly. The effect of diameter of polymer pins on indentation and compression behavior of both sandwich panels was studied and results showed that the diameter of polymer pins had a large influence on the compression and indentation behavior of through‐thickness polymer pin–reinforced FCS panel, and the effect of adding polymer pins to FCS panel on indentation behavior is similar to the effect of increasing the thickness of face sheet. The effect of strain rate on indentation behavior of FCS panel and through‐thickness polymer pin–reinforced FCS panel were studied, and results showed that both types of composite sandwich panels are strain rate dependent structure as by increasing strain rate, the indentation properties and energy absorption properties of these structures are increased. POLYM. COMPOS., 37:612–619, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre for Composites Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 81310 Johor Bahru Johor Malaysia

Funding

Research University grant (GUP)

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Abrate S. · 2005
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2011.02.013 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.002 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.01010.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.010 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.014 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.03.02510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.03.025 ↗
7. Nettles A.T. · ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. · 2002 · 1416 · 116
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.02310.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.023 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.010 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2009.10.005 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.02410.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.024 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2009.08.016 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2009.11.005 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00087-910.1016/S0263-8223(02)00087-9 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.004 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11340-006-7103-310.1007/s11340-006-7103-3 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.020 ↗
19. Yoon S.H. · 1999 · 373
20. 10.1007/s10443-012-9285-410.1007/s10443-012-9285-4 ↗
21. Larry E.S. · 2001
22. 10.1007/1-4020-3848-8_7010.1007/1-4020-3848-8_70 ↗
23. ASTM Standard D365 · 2006
24. 10.1201/978142003168310.1201/9781420031683 ↗
25. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.229-231.76610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.229-231.766 ↗
26. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.229-231.30310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.229-231.303 ↗