Promoting the adhesion of high‐performance polymer fibers using functional plasma polymer coatings
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Plasma‐copolymerized functional coatings of acrylic acid and 1,7‐octadiene were deposited onto high strength, high modulus, poly‐p‐phenylene benzobisoxazole (PBO) fibers. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) with trifluoroethanol derivatization confirmed that the PBO fibers were covered completely with the plasma copolymer and that the coating contained a quantitative concentration of carboxylic acid groups. Microdebond single filament adhesion and interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) tests were used to evaluate the interfacial strength of epoxy resin composites containing these functionalized PBO fibers. Both the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) obtained from single filament tests, and the ILSS of high volume fraction composites were a function of the surface functionality of the fibers so that there was a good correlation between ILSS and IFSS data. The tensile strengths of single fibers with or without coating were comparable, demonstrating that the fiber surface was not damaged in the plasma‐coating procedure. Indeed, the statistical analysis showed that Weibull modulus was increased. Therefore, plasma‐polymerized coatings can be used to control the interfacial bond between PBO fibers and matrix resins and act as a protective size for preserving the mechanical properties of the fibers. POLYM. COMPOS., 2009. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1023/A:101320591820810.1023/A:1013205918208 ↗
2. Lee S.‐G. · J. Polym. Eng. · 1998 · 18 · 4910.1515/polyeng-1998-1-206 ↗
3. 10.1163/156856198X0026310.1163/156856198X00263 ↗
4. 10.1002/app.1981.07026063010.1002/app.1981.070260630 ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0240296410.1007/BF02402964 ↗
6. Brown J.R. · J. Mater. Sci. · 1993 · 12 · 754
7. 10.1023/A:101865450185110.1023/A:1018654501851 ↗
8. 10.1163/156856191X0011610.1163/156856191X00116 ↗
9. Pitt W.G. · SAMPE Q. · 1991 · 23 · 39
10. 10.1163/156856192X0033110.1163/156856192X00331 ↗
11. 10.1080/0021846960801109310.1080/00218469608011093 ↗
12. 10.1002/app.1991.07042091810.1002/app.1991.070420918 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.1992.07044021610.1002/app.1992.070440216 ↗
14. 10.1002/app.1992.07044021710.1002/app.1992.070440217 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00162-510.1016/S0266-3538(96)00162-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00109-210.1016/S1359-835X(98)00109-2 ↗
17. 10.1080/0021846021093510.1080/00218460210935 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00088-210.1016/S1359-835X(97)00088-2 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00162-810.1016/S1359-835X(02)00162-8 ↗
20. 10.1016/0032-3861(88)90297-210.1016/0032-3861(88)90297-2 ↗
21. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(20000615)38:12<1605::AID-POLB50>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(20000615)38:12<1605::AID-POLB50>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
22. 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00784-810.1016/S0032-3861(98)00784-8 ↗
23. 10.1116/1.58128810.1116/1.581288 ↗
24. 10.1007/BF0036759010.1007/BF00367590 ↗
25. 10.1016/0032-3861(96)00333-310.1016/0032-3861(96)00333-3 ↗
26. van der Zwaag S. · J. Test. Mater. · 1989 · 17 · 292
27. 10.1016/0010-4361(94)90199-610.1016/0010-4361(94)90199-6 ↗
28. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199603)24:3<217::AID-SIA103>3.0.CO;2-L10.1002/(SICI)1096-9918(199603)24:3<217::AID-SIA103>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
29. Z.Liu F.M.Zao andF.R.Jones Compos. Sci. Technol. submitted.
30. 10.1039/a708064f10.1039/a708064f ↗
31. 10.1002/app.1990.07041070210.1002/app.1990.070410702 ↗
32. 10.1021/ma951841710.1021/ma9518417 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00479-X10.1016/S0032-3861(96)00479-X ↗