Effect of surface treatment on the physical and mechanical properties of injection molded poly(lactic acid)‐coir fiber biocomposites
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, two different surface treatments were evaluated to improve the compatibility of coir fibers with poly(lactic acid). The chemical modifications were achieved by fiber surface treatment with a maleic anhydride grafted to poly(lactic acid) (MAPLA) solution or a poly(methyl vinyl ether‐alt‐maleic anhydride) (MA‐c‐PMVE) aqueous solution. The fibers were analyzed by attenuated total reflectance‐Fourier transform infrared to determine the type and level of surface modification. The biocomposites were compounded via extrusion and molded by injection. Mechanical testing showed increases in tensile modulus (around 16%) and flexural modulus (around 16%) for both treatments, but MA‐c‐PMVE (29%) was more effective than MAPLA (15%) in strength improvement. Finally, the surface treated fibers led to much lower biocomposites water absorption than untreated ones. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:2132–2141, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Madera, Celulosa y Papel Universidad de Guadalajara Carretera Guadalajara‐Nogales km 15.5, Las Agujas, Zapopan Jalisco 45510 Mexico
Departamento de Ingeniería Química Universidad de Guadalajara Blvd. Gral. Marcelino García Barragán no. 1451, Guadalajara Jalisco 44430 Mexico
Department of Chemical Engineering and CERMA Université Laval Quebec City Quebec G1V 0A6 Canada
Funding
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10924-014-0706-310.1007/s10924-014-0706-3 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.2364410.1002/pc.23644 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.004 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2014.09.00910.1016/j.mechmat.2014.09.009 ↗
5. 10.1002/app.4375010.1002/app.43750 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.03.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2013.03.012 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.03210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.03.032 ↗
8. 10.1007/s12221-014-0847-y10.1007/s12221-014-0847-y ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2116510.1002/pc.21165 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.12.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.12.005 ↗
11. 10.1002/mame.20100040310.1002/mame.201000403 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.02.03010.1016/j.compositesb.2014.02.030 ↗
13. 10.1080/09276440.2018.143962210.1080/09276440.2018.1439622 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10570-012-9836-810.1007/s10570-012-9836-8 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2013.06.003 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2356410.1002/pc.23564 ↗
17. 10.1080/09276440.2016.118455610.1080/09276440.2016.1184556 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.2334610.1002/app.23346 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.01.03010.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.01.030 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.003 ↗
21. Lv S. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2016 · 133 · 4329510.1002/app.43295 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.12.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2009.12.006 ↗
23. 10.1002/pc.2323710.1002/pc.23237 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.2800410.1002/app.28004 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.01.01310.1016/j.compscitech.2013.01.013 ↗
26. 10.1007/s13726-015-0395-310.1007/s13726-015-0395-3 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.022 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.06.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2010.06.005 ↗
29. 10.1002/app.3318410.1002/app.33184 ↗
30. 10.1177/073168441558478410.1177/0731684415584784 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.04510.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.045 ↗