journal article·1993-10

Micromechanics prediction of the transverse tensilc strength of carobn fiber/epoxy composites: The influence of the matrix and interface

D. M. Blackketter, D. Upadhyaya, T. R. King

Polymer Composites· Volume 14· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Currently, there is great interest in understanding and improving the bond between the fibers and matrix in high performcance composite materials. In many recently developed systems, fiber surface treatments have been developed to improve poor bonding. These treatments are often evaluated by measureing their effect on a composite property sensitive to the interfacial bond strength, typically the composite shear strength. This paper presents an evaluation of the influence of the matrix and interface properties on the transverse tensile strength. These effects were quantified by compring transverse flexural experimental data with results from a finite element micromechanics model. The results indicate that the transverse tensile strength is significantly more dependent upon sizing than is the shear strength. Finally, the transvere flexure test appears to provide an additional and complementary test for evaluating interface bond characteristics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/00219983920260040610.1177/002199839202600406 ↗
2. T. R.King PhD dissertation University of Wyoming Laramie Wyo. (1989).
3. L. J.Broutman. “Measurement of the Fiber Polymer In terface Strength ” inInterfaces in Composites ASTMSTP 452 pp.27–41 American Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia(1969).10.1520/STP44698S ↗
4. M. J.RichandI. T.Drzal. “Interfacial Properties of Some High‐Strain Carbon Fibers in an Epoxy Matris ” 41st Annual Conferences Reinforced Plastics / Composites Institute. Session 2F Society of the Plastics Industry (1986).
5. 10.1520/CTR10068J10.1520/CTR10068J ↗
6. 10.1177/00219983910250050410.1177/002199839102500504 ↗
7. Folias E. S. · J. Compos. Mat. · 1991 · 25 · 95810.1177/002199839102500706 ↗
8. 10.1177/00219983910250080210.1177/002199839102500802 ↗
9. Cilensik R. F. · 1984
10. D. A.CraneandD. F.Adams “Finite Element Micromechanical Analysis of Unidirectional Composites Including Longitudinal Shean Loading ” Report no. UWME‐DR‐901–102–1 Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Wyoming Laramie Wyo. (1981).
11. 10.1177/00219983690030020910.1177/002199836900300209 ↗
12. D. E.WalrathandD. F.Adams “Finite Element Micromechanics and Minimechanics Modeling of a three‐Dimensional Carbon‐Carbon Composite ” Report No. UWME‐DR–501–106–1 Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Wyoming Laramie Wyo. (1985).10.21236/ADA168050 ↗
13. 10.1016/0266-3538(90)90080-O10.1016/0266-3538(90)90080-O ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0110720210.1007/BF01107202 ↗
15. 1988
16. Tsai S. W. · 1987
17. J. M.WhitneyandI. T.Drzal. “Axisymmertric Stress Distribution Around an Isolated Fiber Fragment ” inToughened Composites ASTMSTP 937 pp.179–96 N. J.Johnston ed. Americal Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia(1987).10.1520/STP24378S ↗
18. 1987
19. J. A.King PhD dissertation University of Wyoming Laramie. Wyo. (1989).
20. 10.2514/3.512510.2514/3.5125 ↗