journal article·1995-02

Fracture toughness characterization of phenolic resin and its composite

M. N. Charalambides, J. G. Williams

Polymer Composites· Volume 16· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study is to determine the fracture toughness of phenolic resin and its composite. Fracture tests on phenolic resin resulted in a fracture toughness close to values quoted for unmodified epoxy resins. Composite specimens of glass fiber reinforced phenolic were also tested. The interlaminar fracture toughness in both mode I and mode II failures was determined. The mode I initiation values were lower than the neat resin's toughness. Mode I propagation values were strongly influenced by fiber bridging. The mechanism of fiber bridging was found to be sensitive to specimen dimensions. The effect of fiber bridging on the mode I analysis is discussed. Fiber bridging was also evident in mode II failures. Two different geometries were used for the mode II tests (end loaded split and end notched flexure); a correlation between the results from the two geometries is made.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. K. L.Forsdyke “Phenolic Matrix Resins—The Way of Safer Reinforced Plastics ”43rd Ann. Conf. SPI Compos. Inst.(1988).
2. 10.1016/0142-9418(90)90045-F10.1016/0142-9418(90)90045-F ↗
3. M. N.Charalambides Ph D dissertation Department of Mechanical Engineering Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine University of London (1992).
4. 10.1016/0266-3538(89)90041-910.1016/0266-3538(89)90041-9 ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0072654210.1007/BF00726542 ↗
6. 10.1016/0266-3538(90)90041-310.1016/0266-3538(90)90041-3 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0001779010.1007/BF00017790 ↗
8. Russell A. J. · 1982 · 279
9. 10.1177/07316844820010040210.1177/073168448200100402 ↗
10. 10.1098/rspa.1990.000710.1098/rspa.1990.0007 ↗
11. 10.1016/0266-3538(89)90058-410.1016/0266-3538(89)90058-4 ↗
12. 10.1016/0266-3538(92)90096-L10.1016/0266-3538(92)90096-L ↗
13. W. D.Bascom G. W.Bullman D. L.HunstonandR. M.Jensen 29th SAMPE Symp. p.970 Soc. Adv. Mater. Process Eng. Covina Calif. (1984).
14. W. L.Bradley andR. N.Cohen Delamination and Debonding of Materials ASTMSTP 876 p.389 Am. Soc. Test. Mater. Philadelphia(1985).10.1520/STP36316S ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0072647510.1007/BF00726475 ↗
16. Davies P. · SAMPE Quart. · 1987 · 19 · 19
17. 10.1016/0022-5096(92)90198-B10.1016/0022-5096(92)90198-B ↗
18. 10.1177/00219983840180060610.1177/002199838401800606 ↗
19. 10.1177/00219983900240090210.1177/002199839002400902 ↗
20. 10.1016/0266-3538(89)90085-710.1016/0266-3538(89)90085-7 ↗
21. Y. J.Prel P.Davies M. L.Benzeggagh andF. X.de Charentenay Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture 2ndVol p.251 ASTMSTP 1012 Am. Soc. Test. Mater. Philadelphia(1989).10.1520/STP10419S ↗
22. 10.1016/0266-3538(92)90003-L10.1016/0266-3538(92)90003-L ↗
23. 10.1016/0266-3538(90)90013-U10.1016/0266-3538(90)90013-U ↗
24. 10.1016/0266-3538(89)90040-710.1016/0266-3538(89)90040-7 ↗
25. 10.1177/00219983890230040710.1177/002199838902300407 ↗
26. A. J.Kinloch Y.Wang J. G.Williams andP.Yayla accepted byCompos. Sci. Technol.(1992).
27. Sekine H. · 1990 · 388
28. A. J.RussellandK. N.Street Delamination and Debonding of Materials p.349ASTMSTP 876 Am. Soc. Test. Mater. Philadelphia(1985).10.1520/STP36314S ↗