Transmission of ultraviolet light through reinforcement fabrics and its effect on ultraviolet curing of composite laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The ultraviolet transmission of various reinforcement textiles was quantified experimentally for the case of incidence of light normal on the fabric plane, and correlated with the curing behavior of laminates incorporating these fabrics. For glass fiber fabrics wetted with polyester resin, light is transmitted through the voids between the fiber bundles and through the fiber bundles. Multiscale modeling of the fabric geometry allows the local transmission to be estimated and the average total transmission to be quantified. The results of curing experiments suggest that the degree of through‐cure achieved after a given cure time is correlated to the fabric transmission. Both are determined by the laminate thickness, the fabric architecture and the fiber volume fraction, i.e., the fiber packing density. While the transmission is reduced by the presence of the reinforcement fabrics, the total resin volume is reduced when compared with that of a resin only sample of the same thickness. A lower radiation dose is sufficient for curing, which partially compensates for the effect of reduced transmission. POLYM. COMPOS., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. A.Endruweit M.S.Johnson andA.C.Long “Properties of Polyester‐Glass Fibre Laminates Produced by Ultraviolet Curing” in Proc. 12th European Conference on Composite Materials Biarritz (2006).
2. Narayanan V. · Trends Polym. Sci. · 1997 · 5 · 415
3. 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00046.x10.1046/j.1365-4362.1997.00046.x ↗
4. 10.1046/j.1529-8019.2003.01603.x10.1046/j.1529-8019.2003.01603.x ↗
5. 10.2307/317997810.2307/3179978 ↗
6. 10.1034/j.1600-0781.2002.180105.x10.1034/j.1600-0781.2002.180105.x ↗
7. Crews P.C. · AATCC Rev. · 2004 · 4 · 41
8. 10.2115/fiber.60.28110.2115/fiber.60.281 ↗
9. 10.2115/fiber.61.18310.2115/fiber.61.183 ↗
10. 10.1108/0955622991027633110.1108/09556229910276331 ↗
11. Cay A. · T. Eng. Comput. Technol. · 2004 · 2 · 95
12. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970613)64:11<2073::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-G10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970613)64:11<2073::AID-APP3>3.0.CO;2-G ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.1050910.1002/pc.10509 ↗
14. 10.6028/jres.106.03010.6028/jres.106.030 ↗
15. Narayanan V. · RadTech. Rep. · 1997 · 11 · 25
16. Lackey E. · RadTech. Rep. · 2001 · 15 · 36
17. Jung T. · Sampe J. · 1998 · 34 · 40
18. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00318-410.1016/S0266-3538(02)00318-4 ↗
19. 10.1088/0957-0233/15/7/00110.1088/0957-0233/15/7/001 ↗
20. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/1/00910.1088/0964-1726/13/1/009 ↗
21. Erkennen von Kunststoffen: Brechzahl und Transparenz Available at http://uniat5403.ag5.mpisb.mpg.de/petzidat/pa_ksearch.page101 (Viewed 06 October2005).
22. Long A.C. · Polym. Polym. Compos. · 1996 · 4 · 335
23. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00081-010.1016/S1359-835X(99)00081-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.04.013 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.03110.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.031 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.00210.1016/j.dental.2005.05.002 ↗
27. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199802)45:2<133::AID-PI969>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199802)45:2<133::AID-PI969>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.08.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.08.003 ↗
29. TexGen (Version 3.0.1) University of Nottingham (2006). Available athttp://texgen.sourceforge.net(Viewed 11 December2006).
30. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.020 ↗